From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29704 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [off-list, urgent] Index design Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:50 +0200 Message-ID: <44C78A6E.4030604@elvenkind.com> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153927835 25381 80.91.229.2 (26 Jul 2006 15:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jul 26 17:30:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5lKn-00030d-9e for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DA91FDE6; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32443-10-5; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3CB1FDE7; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772751FDE3 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32443-10-4 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lochside.elvenkind.com (elvenknd.xs4all.nl [213.84.171.68]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 694C01FDD3 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lochside.elvenkind.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3681B1BE30 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lochside.elvenkind.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (glenfiddich.elvenkind.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21923-08 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.10.0.6] (glenlivet.elvenkind.com [10.10.0.6]) by lochside.elvenkind.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1DA1B915 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:29:50 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.1.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvenkind.net X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29704 Archived-At: Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: >>(Sorry for the strange conversation, but my e-mail appears with about >>20 minutes delay on the list. And Hans is faster.) > > I've noticed this too, after I found many examples where Hans or Taco > would answer questions that I didn't even know people had! It seems > that some emails (based on From: or destination address?) are delayed > longer than others by the mailing list. > > Any ideas about what causes it? Would a few full headers showing what It happens to me as well, and it is worse on moment when there is more spam. My guess is that because spam and virus filtering are often queue-based (as a resource control measure), more mail equals longer handling time. Cheers, taco