\in

\in

[Renaud AUBIN]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]

Hi all,

Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
- \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
- \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
_ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1

Up to now I have used:
- \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
- \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
- \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]

Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?

Cheers,

Renaud

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 746 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: \in

[David Arnold]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]

A partial answer:

\definereferenceformat[infigure][text=Figure]
\definereferenceformat[infigures][text=Figures]
\definereferenceformat[intable][text=Table]
\definereferenceformat[intables][text=Tables]
\definereferenceformat[insection][text=Section]
\definereferenceformat[inequation][left=(,right=),text=equation]
\definereferenceformat[inexample][text=Example]
\definereferenceformat[indefinition][text=Definition]

Then, in \inequation[eq:newton], we see ...

On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Renaud AUBIN wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>
> Up to now I have used:
> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
>
> Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Renaud
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2053 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: \in

[Aditya Mahajan]

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Renaud AUBIN wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>
> Up to now I have used:
> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]

Here is a very simple mechanism, I do not take 
care of all the bells and whistles [1] of \in.

\def\myin[#1:#2]{
   \expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
     \writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
     \in[#1:#2]
   \else
     \csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
   \fi}

\definereferenceformat[insec][text=Section]

\starttext
\section[sec:one]{One}

\placeformula[eq:1]\startformula
   a = b
\stopformula

What happens in \myin[sec:one] equation \myin[eq:1].

\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)]

What happens in \myin[sec:one] equation \myin[eq:1].

\stoptext

[1] Remember that \in is a very complex command. You can use
\in section [sec:one] instead of \in{section}[sec:one] and also do 
subnumbering.

> Moreover, how could I set the face of the output ?

I do not know how. You can abuse left, right options to do this, but I 
think that there is a better way.

Aditya

Re: \in

[Peter Münster]

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

> \def\myin[#1:#2]{
>    \expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
>      \writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
>      \in[#1:#2]
>    \else
>      \csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
>    \fi}

And if you want to suppress unwanted spaces, you can add some "%":

\def\myin[#1:#2]{%
   \expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
     \writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}%
     \in[#1:#2]%
   \else
     \csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]%
   \fi}

Cheers, Peter

-- 
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

Re: \in

[Hans van der Meer]

On Aug 5, 2006, at 6:10, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is that possible to setup the \in command to obtain:
>> - \in[fig:fig_ref] returns figure 1.1
>> - \in[eq:eq_ref] returns (1.1)
>> _ \in[sec:sec_ref] returns section 2.1
>>
>> Up to now I have used:
>> - \in{figure}[fig:fig_ref]
>> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after  
>> "(" )
>> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
>
> Here is a very simple mechanism, I do not take
> care of all the bells and whistles [1] of \in.
>

I wrestled with the same problem and solved it by calling  
specifically \ineq for equations and programming it as:
% Parenthesized equation references
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)]

Hans van der Meer

\in

[David Arnold]

All,

How does one setup \in so that all references are surrounded with parentheses?

For example, \in{equation][euler] ....

would be displayed as

For example, equation (3) ...

Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want a different
format for references to equation than figures, etc.

Perhaps define my own reference, something like

\def\eqref#1{\in{equation}[now I'm stuck

Any suggestions?

Re: \in

[Taco Hoekwater]

>>>>> "David" == David Arnold <darnold@northcoast.com> writes:

    David> All, How does one setup \in so that all references are
    David> surrounded with parentheses?

    David> For example, \in{equation][euler] ....

    David> would be displayed as

    David> For example, equation (3) ...

    David> Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want
    David> a different format for references to equation than figures,
    David> etc.

I have the same problem.

Taco

Re: \in

[Hans Hagen]

Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "David" == David Arnold <darnold@northcoast.com> writes:
> 
>     David> All, How does one setup \in so that all references are
>     David> surrounded with parentheses?
> 
>     David> For example, \in{equation][euler] ....
> 
>     David> would be displayed as
> 
>     David> For example, equation (3) ...
> 
>     David> Also, one would need to do this selectively, as one my want
>     David> a different format for references to equation than figures,
>     David> etc.
> 
> I have the same problem.

I've put in on my list. A low level addition is needed. Not that
complicated in itself, but I need to do it carefully (shared low level
macros and so). 

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------