From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30258 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Floats Method Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:03 +0200 Message-ID: <44DED8BB.7090702@elvenkind.com> References: <44D080F2.8286.365E0B@wwl.musensturm.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155455192 19211 80.91.229.2 (13 Aug 2006 07:46:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Aug 13 09:46:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCAfq-0001ih-Ox for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236111FEEC; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11108-04; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6047C1FE84; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F521FE84 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13864-01 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from post-26.mail.nl.demon.net (post-26.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.196]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id D8BAF1FE79 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:1042 helo=[10.10.0.3]) by post-26.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GCAfX-000FrP-WC for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:46:00 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <44D080F2.8286.365E0B@wwl.musensturm.de> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30258 Archived-At: wwl@musensturm.de wrote: > Hallo! > > In \setupfloats[] what exactly is the difference between textmethod > and sidemethod? textmethod is used for floats inside the text flow, sidemethod for sidefloats. > Compared with the gridsize, why does a 1 point window (method=2) help > when typesetting on grids? I assume it corrects for the \lineskip glue. > Isn't 1% (method=1) much more in the most cases than 1 point? Yes it would be. Perhaps that one is because of \maxdepth, but I am only guessing. The fact that there are two methods could be simply a trial-and-error left over. Taco