From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31465 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Fundamental change in index mechanism ? Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:32:59 +0200 Message-ID: <453B56EB.7070201@elvenkind.com> References: <575B3C7E-6D80-4166-B0FE-4B384FF071E6@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161516797 19884 80.91.229.2 (22 Oct 2006 11:33:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 22 13:33:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbbZn-0005iW-BP for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:33:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2141FE9D; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:33:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04680-05-8; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B480E1FE75; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4081FE79 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04680-05-7 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from post-26.mail.nl.demon.net (post-26.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.196]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 910E31FE72 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:47273 helo=[10.10.0.3]) by post-26.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GbbZb-000Eys-97 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:32:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.6.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <575B3C7E-6D80-4166-B0FE-4B384FF071E6@st.estfiles.de> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31465 Archived-At: Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Hi, > > because of a second edition I had to typeset a project from august > 2006 a second time (with very, very little text changes). > > Then, I experienced that the register had changed (a simple \index > [keyword] and \placeregister[index]). > And with a closer look I saw that in the first edition the index > entries also get listed in the index register when appearing also in > the TOC content! Now, it was impossible for me to reproduce this: The > first listed entries now came from the beginning of the actual text. > > Is this a know bug? (Is there already a fix for it?) IMO, the current behaviour (as I understand it) is a bugfix for the known bug of pointlessly indexing a lookup table. Ask yourself: why would anyone want to be pointed to the table of contents from within the register? Taco