From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31473 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ConTeXt on Debian: The wiki entry Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <453CA039.5010404@elvenkind.com> References: <86hcxv77l9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161601097 4662 80.91.229.2 (23 Oct 2006 10:58:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Oct 23 12:58:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbxVW-0001pZ-Rw for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0561FD88; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21607-01; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F8A1FD8D; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A191FDE3 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21435-02-4 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from post-26.mail.nl.demon.net (post-26.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.196]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 11B701FD88 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:45925 helo=[10.10.0.3]) by post-26.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GbxVK-000B1D-HQ for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:58:02 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.6.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <86hcxv77l9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31473 Archived-At: Hi Frank, Frank K=FCster wrote: > = > Are some of the people around who wrote this? I found some information I do not use Debian and did not write that page, but I can answer your questions partially, at least. > - Is it intended that context formats end up in $TEXMF/web2c/pdfetex/? > If yes, why is that so? If not, we should rather find out why it > happens and fix it. Yes, it is. ConTeXt does not support only pdfetex, but all major engines, like XeTeX and Aleph. I have formats in: = $TEXMF/web2c/aleph/ $TEXMF/web2c/luatex/ $TEXMF/web2c/pdfetex/ $TEXMF/web2c/xetex/ > - Why does it make a difference if the formats are created by fmtutil > instead of texexec (Except for the output directory)? Should the > upstream packaging be changed so that fmtutil is never used, but > texexec, or should fmtutil be fixed to produce the same as texexec? = It is almost certainly better to ignore/block fmtutil and use texexec instead. Properly setting up a ConTeXt update is not necesarily limited to format generation only. Greetings, Taco