From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31628 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Duncan Hothersall Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: TABLE in item Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:23:21 +0000 Message-ID: <4544AB49.8040607@capdm.com> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162128266 4338 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 13:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 29 14:24:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeAeA-0005dx-H0 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38E81FE9F; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05086-04; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6D91FE3C; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8121FE46 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05018-08 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from nbg01-smtpauth-04.lumison.net (nbg01-smtpauth-04.lumison.net [87.246.68.12]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 100B01FE37 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:24:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 13828 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2006 13:24:07 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO liszt-12.ednet.co.uk) (212.20.226.36) by smtp-auth.lumison.net with SMTP; 29 Oct 2006 13:24:07 -0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31628 Archived-At: > \let\beforeTABLEsplitbox\relax > \let\afterTABLEsplitbox \relax > \let\beforeTABLEbox \relax > \let\afterTABLEbox \relax > > you can play with these macros since they are the formal hooks Hans, I played with \let\beforeTABLEsplitbox\dontleavehmode \def\afterTABLEsplitbox{\relax\dontleavehmode} \let\beforeTABLEbox\dontleavehmode \let\afterTABLEbox\relax which gives the right indents but stops the tables splitting. I think I will just have to live with non-splitting tables for now, unless you can suggest a better redefinition? Thanks very much for the help anyway. Duncan