Re: unic-xxx.tex glyph lists: minor bugs, questions

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>>> The best way out would be if I could enable ConTeXt's UTF-8 regime while
>>>> running XeTeX in \XeTeXinputencoding=bytes mode, but I haven't gotten
>>>> that to work yet.
>>>>         
>
> That would mean that you loose the whole range of glyphs & scripts
> outside of the scope which ConTeXt supports (you would land almost at
> the level of pdfTeX again). For most european users that might still
> be something reasonable, but I wouldn't go that way.
>
>   
>>> maybe mojca has
>>>       
>
> (little correction to what I wrote in my previous mail)
>
> If you were really looking for that part of code - simply replace
> \expandafter \endinput inside XETEX block in regi-utf.tex with
> \XeTeXinputencoding=bytes. Then \enableregime[utf-8] will mean that
> ConTeXt took control over utf instead of XeTeX. From what I understood
> on the wiki, it probably used to be that way at the beginning, but
> then Hans changed his mind and decided to ignore \enableregime[utf]
> completely when processing with XeTeX.
>   
indeed; when this is uncommented (i.e. traditional utf is used) ... do the patterns still work as expected? 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------