Re: LM typsescript problem

[Alan Bowen <acbowen@Princeton.EDU>]

Many thanks for this explanation of what works now, Mocja.

I am going to move my luatex problem (which you mention below) back to  
its original thread. (If only because it is really nice to tie off the  
LM problem and call it solved.).

Alan

On Feb 25, 2009, at 08;23,43 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 21:03, Alan Bowen wrote:
>> I have run the ./first-setup.sh without the switch --context=beta  
>> and I
>> still get what I had before
>> ConTeXt  ver: 2009.01.18 14:39 MKII  fmt: 2009.2.23  int: english/ 
>> english
>> a beta version (I gather) which in any case does not work.
>
> If you remove --context=beta you should (at least in theory) get the
> "current". At the moment this exceptionally doesn't correspond with
> the "current" version on Pragma because what's in current doesn't work
> with the latest released luatex beta.
>
> Also, --context=beta exceptionally doesn't correspond to the true beta
> from pragma, because the current beta doesn't work with the latest
> released luatex beta.
>
> If you want to go back in time with ConTeXt, you can use
> --context=yyyy.mm.dd (see
> http://minimals.contextgarden.net/current/context/).
>
> You can also use --context=alpha or --context=experimental, but we
> don't have all the needed binaries set up, so in that case you
> probably need to compile luatex yourself (I'll try to fix that once I
> get back home).
>
> alpha = alpha from Pragma if one is available, else beta, else current
> (if there's no beta)
>
>> Apparently there is no easy way to go back. So what about going  
>> forward?
>> When will the ConTeXt minimals accessible by ./first-setup.sh be  
>> updated?
>
> current: whenever Hans releases a new current
> beta: whenever the next luatex beta will be released
> alpha, experimental: updated hourly, but don't work out of the box
> without using your own luatex
>
>> A subsidiary worry. By moving the contents of my texmf folder into
>> /ContextMinimals/tex/texmf-project/ I now get duplicate pattern error
>> messages (lang-agr.pat is the culprit) when the shell script runs.  
>> But there
>> is only one lang-agr.pat file in ConTeXtMinimals, so what does this  
>> mean?
>> (There is no error message if I remove texmf-project before running  
>> the
>> script.)
>
> Totally weird. Taco? Hans?
>
> Mojca
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an  
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________