Re: float next to \bf

[Willi Egger <w.egger@boede.nl>]

Hi,

dunno, but it seems, that there is really something wrong. Here using:
ConTeXt  ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII  fmt: 2007.1.19  int: english/english

\starttext
\input tufte
% \placefigure[here,left]{A figure}{\framed[width=3cm,height=4cm]{Image}}
\placefigure[here,left]{A cow}{\externalfigure[cow][width=3cm,height=4cm]}
\blank
{\em This will mess up the rest.} \input tufte
\stoptext

I changed the sample slightly. With and without \em the cow is placed on 
top of the textblock. This happens also with [here,left] and [here,right]
If you withdraw the {This will mess up the rest.} the figure is placed 
correctly with inner, left, right! If you remove the braces and \em it 
works also
adding \bgroup of \start and \egroup resp. \stop will not help.

\em
This will mess up the rest.
\tf
\input tufte

gives the expected result.

\dontleavehmode finally gives the correct output of the original sample.

Willi

Hans Hagen wrote:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>   
>> OK, I see. I had a similar problem a while ago. My workaround: type  
>> \dontleavehmode in front of the {\em part, and it will typeset  
>> correctly. But this seems to be a real bug, most commands will mess  
>> up the vertical spacing in a similar way. Hans, Taco???
>>   
>>     
> bug ... dunno, more a side effect; resolving this will break other things; side floats are real nasty: force into otr mode and go back and ...you don't wanna know)  
>
> Hans 
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>