From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/33202 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Problems with fonts Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:05:36 +0100 Message-ID: <45C844E0.2070904@wxs.nl> References: <20070204142808.M45979@iitm.ac.in> <6faad9f00702040956v3451f48bka360adefcda9eeff@mail.gmail.com> <20070205113109.GF32514@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20070205125259.GJ32514@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <45C736DB.7030507@wxs.nl> <20070205170747.GC2103@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20070206013938.GA6414@localhost> <20070206015755.GA7054@localhost> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170752780 20263 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2007 09:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: preining@logic.at To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Feb 06 10:06:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEMHJ-0007hJ-Mc for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:06:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E725D9; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:17 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25646-05; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8FFD5; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC014D5 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26080-05-2 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83C0D4 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:05:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.101] (unverified [10.100.1.101]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.7b8) with ESMTP id 7522 for multiple; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:05:31 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:33202 Archived-At: Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:09:38AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >> >>> Same holds for \Omega. Actually, there is something wrong with the >>> fonts; CMR fonts don't seem to be used. Here is an example: >>> >>> See caption for figures 4, 5, 6 etc. These should have a \Omega >>> wherever there's a blank. Also move to the last page, the font >>> rendering for math is far from OK. I am, in general, unhappy with the >>> fonts: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/ee03b091.pdf >>> >>> A similar document made with the old ConTeXt is: >>> http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/ee03b091_nice.pdf >>> The fonts render very well in Acrobat as well as have all >>> symbols. This is what I was mentioning. >>> >> And the TeX source (to the second document actually) with EPS images, >> is at http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/compile.tar.bz2 >> > > Works fine here, Windows XP, latest ConTeXt standalone from pragma, > and displays fine on Acrobat 7 > > C:\Windows\system32\cmd /c pdffonts ee03b091.pdf > name type emb sub uni object > ID > ------------------------------------ ------------ --- --- --- > --------- > CXCDEM+LMRoman10-CapsRegular Type 1 yes yes yes 4 > 0 > AHZACH+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1 yes yes yes 5 > 0 > NEZHVQ+LMTypewriter10-Regular Type 1 yes yes yes 6 > 0 > QGQEOY+LMRoman10-Bold Type 1 yes yes yes 7 > 0 > DDNRFR+LMMathItalic10-Italic Type 1 yes yes yes 13 > 0 > BWERNX+LMMathSymbols10-Italic Type 1 yes yes yes 14 > 0 > AHZACH+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1 yes yes yes 15 > 0 > TIIOKP+LMMathItalic7-Italic Type 1 yes yes yes 16 > 0 > ZVJQLW+LMMathSymbols7-Italic Type 1 yes yes yes 17 > 0 > DGERKI+LMMathItalic5-Italic Type 1 yes yes yes 18 > 0 > LRNKJI+LMRoman7-Regular Type 1 yes yes yes 19 > 0 > SPNZBI+LMTypewriter8-Regular Type 1 yes yes yes 32 > 0 > > > I noticed that in my result the third column (uni) says yes while in > yours it says no. I do not know if that is the cause of the problem > that has to do with the tounicode vector, may differ per pdftex version, but should not influence the png btw, if the testmachinery is okay, we should try luatex ... there may be differences due to more advanced font handling in context mkiv (no height/depth restrictions, reading from afm instead of tfm) Hans -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------