* Characters per inch with ConTexT
@ 2007-02-14 0:16 Aditya Mahajan
2007-02-14 8:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2007-02-14 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi,
I am writing a document where the guidelines say that I should use
Times Roman font at 10pt with 15 characters per inch and 6 lines per
inch. I am using thermes from tex gyre rscaled=1.015 as the bodyfont.
At this setting I get a bit more less than 6 lines per inch (which is
fine) but roughtly 17 characters per inch. Any way I could setup fonts
so that both these criteria is automatically met?
Why do people come up with such criteria :((
Aditya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Characters per inch with ConTexT
2007-02-14 0:16 Characters per inch with ConTexT Aditya Mahajan
@ 2007-02-14 8:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
2007-02-14 15:14 ` Aditya Mahajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2007-02-14 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a document where the guidelines say that I should use
> Times Roman font at 10pt with 15 characters per inch and 6 lines per
> inch. I am using thermes from tex gyre rscaled=1.015 as the bodyfont.
> At this setting I get a bit more less than 6 lines per inch (which is
> fine) but roughtly 17 characters per inch. Any way I could setup fonts
> so that both these criteria is automatically met?
This should give you exactly 6 lpi @ 10pt
\setupbodyfontenvironment[10pt][interlinespace=12bp]
> Why do people come up with such criteria :((
The average character width in times roman is only a little over 4pt
when loaded at 10pt, resulting in more than 18cpi, so you could try
to explain to them that the 10pt and 15cpm contradict eachother.
But I guess they do not really expect you to do anything with the cpi
statement, unless you are using a typewriter.
Best, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Characters per inch with ConTexT
2007-02-14 8:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
@ 2007-02-14 15:14 ` Aditya Mahajan
2007-02-14 16:26 ` Hans Hagen
2007-02-14 18:18 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2007-02-14 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am writing a document where the guidelines say that I should use
>> Times Roman font at 10pt with 15 characters per inch and 6 lines per
>> inch. I am using thermes from tex gyre rscaled=1.015 as the bodyfont.
>> At this setting I get a bit more less than 6 lines per inch (which is
>> fine) but roughtly 17 characters per inch. Any way I could setup fonts
>> so that both these criteria is automatically met?
>
> This should give you exactly 6 lpi @ 10pt
>
> \setupbodyfontenvironment[10pt][interlinespace=12bp]
Thank you. Now I see an advantage of bp over pt.
>> Why do people come up with such criteria :((
>
> The average character width in times roman is only a little over 4pt
> when loaded at 10pt, resulting in more than 18cpi, so you could try
> to explain to them that the 10pt and 15cpm contradict eachother.
That is what I found. Can I tweak spacefactor and spaceskip to give an
impression that there are 15 cpi.
> But I guess they do not really expect you to do anything with the cpi
> statement, unless you are using a typewriter.
I guess someone made the requirements in 1950 or 1960, and others are
blindly copying them. Maybe, I should typeset everything in monotype
font :)
Aditya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Characters per inch with ConTexT
2007-02-14 15:14 ` Aditya Mahajan
@ 2007-02-14 16:26 ` Hans Hagen
2007-02-14 18:18 ` Taco Hoekwater
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2007-02-14 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> That is what I found. Can I tweak spacefactor and spaceskip to give an
> impression that there are 15 cpi.
>
you can create a shinked font i.e. make an instance with .85% wide chars
(contrary to an extended one)
> I guess someone made the requirements in 1950 or 1960, and others are
> blindly copying them. Maybe, I should typeset everything in monotype
> font :)
>
cm is kind of monotype times ... you mean monospaced -) there is a narrow latin modern tt variant you can use ... 132 chars on 80
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Characters per inch with ConTexT
2007-02-14 15:14 ` Aditya Mahajan
2007-02-14 16:26 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2007-02-14 18:18 ` Taco Hoekwater
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2007-02-14 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> I guess someone made the requirements in 1950 or 1960, and others are
> blindly copying them. Maybe, I should typeset everything in monotype
> font :)
I remember we had a ball-based typewriter at Kluwer Academic that had
variable width characters as well as different fonts: one per ball.
We had a whole bunch of these balls in a cardboard box. So maybe,
they even had variant widths like Times10 @ 10cpi, Times10 @ 12cpi ?
Best, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-14 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-14 0:16 Characters per inch with ConTexT Aditya Mahajan
2007-02-14 8:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
2007-02-14 15:14 ` Aditya Mahajan
2007-02-14 16:26 ` Hans Hagen
2007-02-14 18:18 ` Taco Hoekwater
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).