From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/33938 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: page-break after \section Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:05:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4602EFB3.7010509@elvenkind.com> References: <46028841.8020706@wxs.nl> <4602E5C8.80002@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174597735 25719 80.91.229.12 (22 Mar 2007 21:08:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 22 22:08:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HUUWW-0003i5-Eq for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:08:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB30201B0; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:08:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06992-06; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:08:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28720161; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:06:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B33F20161 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:06:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06892-01-6 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:05:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055FF2015B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:05:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:51884 helo=[10.10.0.6]) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1HUUTr-000BSm-GX for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:05:55 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070105) In-Reply-To: <4602E5C8.80002@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:33938 Archived-At: Hans Hagen wrote: >>> >> Thanks for your explanation! Do you know, how the LaTeX people >> solved this problem? I've never had such surprises with LaTeX. >> > ... > interference with preceding material); i do (did) observe that latex > has a different spacing model (and interfering penalties may be a > reason why sometimes spacing gets messed up); LaTeX is pretty good in keeping section heads together with the following material, but the tradeoff is that sometimes it inserts massive amounts of whitespace on a page, because a section head and a subsection head and the following first two paragraph lines all appear after an automatically inserted pagebreak. IIRC, it also makes float placements harder to predict. Best wishes, Taco