From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17532 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2023 16:22:33 -0000 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (5.39.185.202) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Sep 2023 16:22:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F4748323D for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:21:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoGJ0D9d-XIm for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C6D4832F9 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:20:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576DD48317A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:20:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQTN7FmhO0ai for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:20:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay.yourmailgateway.de (relay.yourmailgateway.de [188.68.63.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AC0483137 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:20:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mors-relay8204.netcup.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mors-relay8204.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RvSl54sLBz8Zk5 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fiee.net; s=key2; t=1695658801; bh=1/LNgDTi9/c0L0t8GjU38oIu7CfbyArxfrql8kkQga0=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=LvuDavw4FPQTW4IVQe5qrrorn15WBvEIdbbK35lP7DdUfQ6fcxE6faBMJrk6z3BZU 8CFP0SLHhmP4NdMwVUd7V/M+UjhiDUV7eXIZn9c/2Ho2rGAPFbFctWRm1K/PvxWWPe qglYYcaYdDj0DhTP8AeMRvRyjyVSyxxwXHr9B3tBddPM8Hb5g6jExn2GP8DR0/RgpX HvuhfqOSttv57rRPz7Pa17Syjk6YYtgN/ZxvPb1f6Bi6qStkfT5l/myRDxq7ZsToiu H4/wuo89mpPHfdWqFNpPzMet25MPFZGtgMsfl2WeIvq/wkdpMVu2JHxMD9NAkUkJrB 4SUwDjHQenREA== Received: from policy02-mors.netcup.net (unknown [46.38.225.35]) by mors-relay8204.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RvSl548mvz8Zk4 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxf9ac.netcup.net (unknown [10.243.12.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by policy02-mors.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RvSl526dNz8sWg for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:20:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (dslb-094-222-129-051.094.222.pools.vodafone-ip.de [94.222.129.51]) by mxf9ac.netcup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1C9512002A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:19:56 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mxf9ac; spf=pass (sender IP is 94.222.129.51) smtp.mailfrom=texml@fiee.net smtp.helo=[192.168.178.23] Received-SPF: pass (mxf9ac: connection is authenticated) Message-ID: <460968ae-5958-4b11-aebd-8a871319df28@fiee.net> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:19:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 To: mailing list for ConTeXt users References: <0ae54add-4e55-b137-526a-9358018bd222@gmx.es> Content-Language: de-DE From: Henning Hraban Ramm In-Reply-To: <0ae54add-4e55-b137-526a-9358018bd222@gmx.es> X-PPP-Message-ID: <169565879696.10359.10770925951765154253@mxf9ac.netcup.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B1C9512002A X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd-worker-8404 X-NC-CID: 6LaR4acSJsglkH8az+/T1/vQ8cirkSR/cy8iMYpz Message-ID-Hash: ZJFRCKDHAXIWYYBTLQUVZTISVRQDDV5Z X-Message-ID-Hash: ZJFRCKDHAXIWYYBTLQUVZTISVRQDDV5Z X-MailFrom: texml@fiee.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Re: \setupitemgroup for footnotes List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: > Dear list, > > I have the following sample (with current latest from 2023.09.18 21:13): > > \setuppapersize[A6] > \starttext > \startsetups[forfootnote] > \setupitemgroup > [itemize][1] > [ before={\endgraf{\ttbf [before]}\endgraf}, > after={\endgraf{\ttbf [after]}\endgraf}] > \stopsetups > > \setupnote[footnote][setups=forfootnote] > > \footnote{\startitemize > \startitem Choose the correct answer. > \startitemize > \item This one > \stopitemize > \stopitem > \stopitemize} > \stoptext > > Excuse my ignorance, but which is the right way to get the itemize setup > only for footnotes? I would use \defineitemgroup to define your own, like "footnoteitemize". https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/defineitemgroup Hraban ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________