From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4792 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Too much unprotection Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:42:22 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <468986777.20010605124222@bigfoot.com> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395432 28771 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:50:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4792 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4792 Hello, I think the latest beta has an unbalanced \unprotect/\protect pair (cont-new's unprotections goes to level 2). I can easily fix this by adding a \protect to cont-new level, but I still wanted to inform you (it is easily detected by commands like \dots?) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta