From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/35522 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: factor=fit images don't fit Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +0200 Message-ID: <46A3C247.6050109@wxs.nl> References: <10310609774.20070720012314@iol.it> <1912359178.20070720130501@iol.it> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185137242 13469 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2007 20:47:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Jul 22 22:47:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICiKm-0006cP-M5 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B902018F; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02920-03-3; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E269820166; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA0720166 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02920-03-2 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A138820158 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.116] (unverified [10.100.1.116]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.7b8) with ESMTP id 6343 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:47:00 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) In-Reply-To: <1912359178.20070720130501@iol.it> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:35522 Archived-At: Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > Friday, July 20, 2007 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> I have to place a number of images into some given-size >> frames in a layer. The images should be scaled >> proportionally to fit into the frame. The code I'm working >> with is: > >> \defineframed[framedimg][ >> frame=on,framecolor=elux, >> background=color, >> backgroundcolor=white, >> width=\wdfig, >> height=\htfigone, >> offset=overlay, >> ] > >> \setlayer[figs][voffset=\nextfigvoff]{% >> \framedimg{% >> \externalfigure[#1][ >> factor=fit, >> % maxwidth=\wdfig, >> % maxheight=\htfigone, >> % frame=on, >> ]% >> }% >> }% > >> where \wdfig, \htfigone are the frame size and \nextfigvoff >> is the vertical offset which must be placed. I've tried >> factor=fit, factor=max, but in both cases I get images which >> cross the boundaries of the frame, mostly in the horizontal >> direction. If I add the maxwidth/maxheight specification, >> images don't get scaled at all. > >> I would expect factor=fit to scale the image in such a way >> that the biggest direction fits into the enclosing box, >> while factor=max would scale the image in such a way that >> the smallest direction fits into the enclosing box. Instead, >> in both cases the vertical direction is being fitted, with >> no apparent consideration for the horizontal direction. > >> What am I doing wrong and what should I do to fix it? > > Ok, I've tried studying the source and I really think that > the way factor scaling is computed is wrong. However, the > fix is nontrivial, and a somewhat thorough checking should > be implemented, with earlier check for the factor value > (fit, max, broad), since the logic selecting which dimension > to scale depends on the kind of scaling. the fit assumes operating on a page not in a box; an alternative is: \framed[width=5cm,height4cm] {\externalfigure[mill.png][maxwidth=4cm,maxheight=5cm,width=10cm]} i.e. setting the maximum values > Anyway, I've found a temporary solutin to my problem by > using a very large value of scale=, coupled with appropriate > maxwidth and maxheight values. > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________