From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/35768 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: OpenType in ConTeXt Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:49:48 +0200 Message-ID: <46B9678C.2020807@elvenkind.com> References: <46B8EFA6.30775.217F112@wwl.musensturm.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186555920 18100 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2007 06:52:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 06:52:00 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Aug 08 08:51:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IIfOf-0004cF-PT for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:51:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D491B20109; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27405-05-2; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:51:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9560920101; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:51:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3CE200FB for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:51:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27405-05 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:51:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AF620101 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:49:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:45811 helo=[10.10.0.6]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1IIfMa-0000pw-Ka for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:49:48 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) In-Reply-To: <46B8EFA6.30775.217F112@wwl.musensturm.de> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:35768 Archived-At: Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote: >>>> well, i still use texfont for type 1 fonts, but for open type i >>>> use luatex anyway which can handle it directly (actually, mkiv also >>>> usese afm files instead of tfm when available, so texfont is not >>>> needed any more) >>> How stable/reliable is LuaTeX for general use? >> Well, "not at all" is the wisest answer I can give. > > Is it possible to run both (mkiv/LuaTeX and mkii/pdfTeX) in parallel? Certainly. In the past year, I have been happy running all of these at the same time: texexec | texexec --pdftex % engine=pdftex texexec --aleph % engine=aleph texexec --luatex % engine=luatex texexec --xetex % engine=xetex Cheers, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________