LuaTeX and Unicode Math

LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Mojca Miklavec]

Hello,

While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
expected, but not necessary desired.)

Is there any cure to it?

% in LM, most characters are not present in otf fonts, so with LM this
wouldn't work at all. Iwona is slightly better in that respect.
\beginOLDTEX
\enableregime[utf-8]
\usetypescript[iwona][ec]
\endOLDTEX
\beginNEWTEX
\usetypescript[iwona]
\endNEWTEX
\setupbodyfont[iwona]

\def\testA{(φ)} % 03c6
\def\testB{(・)} % 00b7
\def\testC{(≤)} % 2264

\starttext
\testA\testB\testC\crlf
$\testA\testB\testC$
\stoptext

I could/should solve the problem with better handling of xml entities
or with fallbacks (if φ is not present in font, use \phi etc.), but I
don't know how to do either of them.

I would normally say something like
   \chardef`φ=\active
   \defφ{\phi}
to solve the problem, but that doesn't work when doing XML conversion.

Thanks,
    Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Aditya Mahajan]

Hi,

> While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
> have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
> text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
> mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
> expected, but not necessary desired.)

I know about this, and this is one of the main reason that I am still 
using pdftex for day to day work.  I have become used to typing most 
of my math in unicode, and now none of it works (with luatex). But I 
have been too busy to actually try to understand what is happening 
behind the scences.

> Is there any cure to it?

AFAIK, luatex has not toched on the math handling of tex yet. There 
are some old ideas on how TeX's math support can be improved, and with 
luatex that is a real possibility. I am sure that at some stage, once 
some aspects of the lua functionality are more stable, this will be 
looked into. It makes sense to finalize mkiv support only after that.

> I could/should solve the problem with better handling of xml entities
> or with fallbacks (if φ is not present in font, use \phi etc.), but I
> don't know how to do either of them.
>
> I would normally say something like
>   \chardef`φ=\active
>   \defφ{\phi}
> to solve the problem, but that doesn't work when doing XML conversion.

Actually, for a unicode aware engine it should be the other way around

\def\phi{φ}

That is, all definemathcommand be changed to something like

\definemathcharacter[φ][<font:location>]

and so on. But my guess is that this will need a overhaul of the math 
character encoding. Again, that is something which I do not understand 
at the moment.

Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Taco Hoekwater]

Hi Mojca,

Your email message uses the chinese simplified (GB2312) encoding,
is that intentional?

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
> have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
> text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
> mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
> expected, but not necessary desired.)
> 
> Is there any cure to it?

Definitions like these should work in luatex (and xetex):

   \definemathcharacter [φ] [nothing] [lcgreek] ["1E]

That is not font-related, it is just input remapping based on
\mathchardef, the same thing happens in traditional tex.

Best wishes,
Taco


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Mojca Miklavec]

Hello Taco,

On 10/3/07, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Your email message uses the chinese simplified (GB2312) encoding,
> is that intentional?

Emmm ... no. But I have no influence on encoding - there seems to be
some "smart" algorithm behind gmail, which tries to guess which
encoding to use. Usually it takes ascii or utf-8, but apparently it
sometimes favors other encodings for some reason :(

> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
> > have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
> > text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
> > mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
> > expected, but not necessary desired.)
> >
> > Is there any cure to it?
>
> Definitions like these should work in luatex (and xetex):
>
>    \definemathcharacter [φ] [nothing] [lcgreek] ["1E]
>
> That is not font-related, it is just input remapping based on
> \mathchardef, the same thing happens in traditional tex.

Thanks a lot. It has made my day :)

However, your example worked OK, but
    \definemathsymbol    [≤] [rel] [sy] ["14]
    \definemathsymbol    [·] [bin] [sy] ["01]
didn't

Thanks,
    Mojca

(čšž - hopefully gmail will choose utf-8 now :)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Hans Hagen]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
> have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
> text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
> mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
> expected, but not necessary desired.)
> 
> Is there any cure to it?

we need to start thinking about unicode math support ... see char-mth
for a starting point, i want to use that file for initializing math,
once i know the rules

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Hans Hagen]

Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
>> have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
>> text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
>> mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
>> expected, but not necessary desired.)
> 
> I know about this, and this is one of the main reason that I am still 
> using pdftex for day to day work.  I have become used to typing most 
> of my math in unicode, and now none of it works (with luatex). But I 
> have been too busy to actually try to understand what is happening 
> behind the scences.

we just need to initialize the mappings,and i had no time for that yet,
when done, we can get rid of most existing math definitions

> AFAIK, luatex has not toched on the math handling of tex yet. There 
> are some old ideas on how TeX's math support can be improved, and with 
> luatex that is a real possibility. I am sure that at some stage, once 
> some aspects of the lua functionality are more stable, this will be 
> looked into. It makes sense to finalize mkiv support only after that.

sure, but adding definitions for unicode math is not that complex and
should work ok

>> I would normally say something like
>>   \chardef`φ=\active
>>   \defφ{\phi}
>> to solve the problem, but that doesn't work when doing XML conversion.

indeed, no option

> Actually, for a unicode aware engine it should be the other way around
> 
> \def\phi{φ}
> 
> That is, all definemathcommand be changed to something like
> 
> \definemathcharacter[φ][<font:location>]

well, we can start thinking of virtal fonts; on the other hand, a year
from now we will have math in the tex gyre fonts so maybe it's not worth
the effort

> and so on. But my guess is that this will need a overhaul of the math 
> character encoding. Again, that is something which I do not understand 
> at the moment.

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Taco Hoekwater]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>     \definemathsymbol    [≤] [rel] [sy] ["14]
>     \definemathsymbol    [·] [bin] [sy] ["01]

You need \definemathcharacter, otherwise you are setting the math 
equivalent of the control sequence \≤, not the character ≤.

It still doesn't work then, but that could be some problem
with initialization of the math collections, i don't know.

A bare

   \mathcode `≤ = "3214

works fine, so it must be a context macro issue.

Best wishes,
Taco

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Mojca Miklavec]

On 10/3/07, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >     \definemathsymbol    [≤] [rel] [sy] ["14]
> >     \definemathsymbol    [·] [bin] [sy] ["01]
>
> You need \definemathcharacter, otherwise you are setting the math
> equivalent of the control sequence \≤, not the character ≤.

Oh, I have overseen that. Thanks a lot, it works now for me, I don't
know why it fails on your side :)

> It still doesn't work then, but that could be some problem
> with initialization of the math collections, i don't know.
>
> A bare
>
>    \mathcode `≤ = "3214
>
> works fine, so it must be a context macro issue.

> we need to start thinking about unicode math support ... see char-mth
> for a starting point, i want to use that file for initializing math,
> once i know the rules

Oh, great! I haven't seen that file :)
I will send you some feedback.

Thanks to both,
    Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Joel C. Salomon]

On 10/3/07, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
> well, we can start thinking of virtal fonts; on the other hand, a year
> from now we will have math in the tex gyre fonts so maybe it's not worth
> the effort

Also Cambria/Cambria Math is obtainable, and the Stix fonts have been
a month away for half a year now.  Truly Unicode-aware math handling
in TeX will be really nice.

--Joel
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Arthur Reutenauer]

> Emmm ... no. But I have no influence on encoding - there seems to be
> some "smart" algorithm behind gmail, which tries to guess which
> encoding to use.

  Once my aunt wrote me an e-mail (in French) using Windows-1258, which was
designed ... for Vietnamese :-)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Joel C. Salomon]

On 10/3/07, Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> Emmm ... no. But I have no influence on encoding - there seems to be
> some "smart" algorithm behind gmail, which tries to guess which
> encoding to use. Usually it takes ascii or utf-8, but apparently it
> sometimes favors other encodings for some reason :(

On the "General" tab in Gmail settings is an option to set "Outgoing
message encoding" either to "default" (= autodetect, with sometimes
amusing results) or to UTF-8.

--Joel
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Mojca Miklavec]

On 10/3/07, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While trying to convert some stuff from HTML to PDF (using LuaTeX) I
> > have noticed some minor problems: unicode math characters work OK in
> > text mode (under assumption that the font has them), but not in math
> > mode. In pdfTeX they work OK in both cases. (That behaviour is
> > expected, but not necessary desired.)
> >
> > Is there any cure to it?
>
> Definitions like these should work in luatex (and xetex):
>
>    \definemathcharacter [φ] [nothing] [lcgreek] ["1E]
>
> That is not font-related, it is just input remapping based on
> \mathchardef, the same thing happens in traditional tex.

What about \neq and \[l]dots? How can I get those working in "unicode
math input"?

\definemathcharacter [≠] {\neq}
is probably not adapted to such definitions.

Thanks a lot,
    Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: LuaTeX and Unicode Math

[Taco Hoekwater]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> 
> What about \neq and \[l]dots? How can I get those working in "unicode
> math input"?

In general, it is better not to do that, (because it is slower
and needs lots of control sequences), but if the font does not contain
what you need, you have no choice, of course.

> \definemathcharacter [≠] {\neq}
> is probably not adapted to such definitions.

You are right, it is not. But the currently ignored command

 \definemathcharacter [≠] [\neq]

could be made to work easily enough. Here is an example of such
an approach (the implementation is very ugly, I am just trying to
demonstrate:


\let\mydodefinemathcharacter\dodefinemathcharacter
\def\dodefinemathcharacter[#1][#2][#3][#4][#5][#6]%
 {\iffourthargument
   \mydodefinemathcharacter[#1][#2][#3][#4][#5][#6]%
  \else
   \begingroup
   \catcode`#1=\active
   \uccode`~=`#1
   \uppercase{\gdef~{#2}}%
   \endgroup
   \mathcode`#1="8000
  \fi}


Best wishes, Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________