From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38873 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Need of a new global option for indenting? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:28 +0100 Message-ID: <47A0C7A8.70201@elvenkind.com> References: <1201717896.47a0c288302e7@imp.free.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201719301 9217 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2008 18:55:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:55:01 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jan 30 19:55:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKI5e-0000tX-0S for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:55:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A181FBD0; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:54:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15841-01-11; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:54:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030941FB3C; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:54:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F9E1FB14 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:54:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09071-05-7 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from www.bittext.nl (unknown [195.86.58.132]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A621F80B for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (vz3.aanhet.net [127.0.0.1]) by www.bittext.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B841E8C2B4 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bittext.nl Original-Received: from www.bittext.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vz3.aanhet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3ofJ0aMO+zr for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.10.0.6] (boo.demon.nl [82.161.175.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.bittext.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D301F1E8C2B3 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:53:26 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) In-Reply-To: <1201717896.47a0c288302e7@imp.free.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38873 Archived-At: morgan.brassel@free.fr wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to bother you with this question again, but I didn't get any definitive > answer in the previous discussion: wouldn't it be useful to have a new option in > \setupindenting that indents EVERY paragraph? I mean even after floats, > formulae, heads, etc. > This is a french typographical tradition thing, isn't it? > It would be easier than to set every 'indentnext' option to 'yes'. My first > thought was that it should be the role of the 'always' option. Is it silly? In fact there is a common entry point for indentnext already, and redefining that woudl do what you want, I believe: \def\checknextindentation[#1]% original {\processaction [#1] [yes=>\doindentation, no=>\noindentation, auto=>\autoindentation]} \def\checknextindentation[#1]{\doindentation} % redefined Hooking into \setupindenting may not be the best idea, because of backward compatibility. If Hans not feel like adding an extra inferface, my next proposal would be to add this redefined command to the t-french module on the garden http://modules.contextgarden.net/t-french Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________