References and formulae numbers in upshape

References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Morgan Brassel]

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in 
command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I 
tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good 
results.

I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know 
Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread 
any more...

Greetings,
Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Aditya Mahajan]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:

>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
> command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
> tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good
> results.
>
> I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> any more...

I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat. 
This is what I use:

\definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
\def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}

And then \eqref[tag]..

Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Morgan Brassel]

Le Thursday 13 March 2008 13:03:22 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
> > command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
> > tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good
> > results.
> >
> > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> > any more...
>
> I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
> This is what I use:
>
> \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
> \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
>
> And then \eqref[tag]..
>
> Aditya

Thank you, I'll use this too! It could be useful to add an option to 
\definereferenceformat to get the same result. Is it hard to implement?

And concerning the equation tag itself, I mean the one introduced by 
\placeformula, is there a way to have it always typeset in upshape?

Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Wolfgang Schuster]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
> > command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
> > tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good
> > results.
> >
> > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> > any more...
> 
> I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat. 
> This is what I use:
> 
> \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
> \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}

Why not

\definereferenceformat
  [eqref]
  [left=\normal(,
   right=)]

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Morgan Brassel]

Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the
> > > \in command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for
> > > example). I tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but
> > > without good results.
> > >
> > > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> > > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> > > any more...
> >
> > I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
> > This is what I use:
> >
> > \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
> > \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
>
> Why not
>
> \definereferenceformat
>   [eqref]
>   [left=\normal(,
>    right=)]
>
> Wolfgang

Is it so simple, really? Great! But can't this have some side effects in 
particular cases? I mean, the {} around \normal aren't needed here?

Well, it seems ok for me in slanted enumerations for theorems and such.
Thank you!

Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Wolfgang Schuster]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:06 +0100
Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:

> Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the
> > > > \in command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for
> > > > example). I tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but
> > > > without good results.
> > > >
> > > > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> > > > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> > > > any more...
> > >
> > > I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
> > > This is what I use:
> > >
> > > \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
> > > \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
> >
> > Why not
> >
> > \definereferenceformat
> >   [eqref]
> >   [left=\normal(,
> >    right=)]
> >
> > Wolfgang
> 
> Is it so simple, really? Great! But can't this have some side effects in 
> particular cases? I mean, the {} around \normal aren't needed here?

Not in this case because references are grouped by themselve but it is
better to use grouping.

\definereferenceformat
  [eqref]
  [left=\bgroup\normal(,
   right=)\egroup]

> Well, it seems ok for me in slanted enumerations for theorems and such.

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Aditya Mahajan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1602 bytes --]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:06 +0100
> Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
>>>
>>> Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the
>>>>> \in command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for
>>>>> example). I tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but
>>>>> without good results.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
>>>>> Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
>>>>> any more...
>>>>
>>>> I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
>>>> This is what I use:
>>>>
>>>> \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
>>>> \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
>>>
>>> Why not
>>>
>>> \definereferenceformat
>>>   [eqref]
>>>   [left=\normal(,
>>>    right=)]
>>>
>>> Wolfgang
>>
>> Is it so simple, really? Great! But can't this have some side effects in
>> particular cases? I mean, the {} around \normal aren't needed here?
>
> Not in this case because references are grouped by themselve but it is
> better to use grouping.
>
> \definereferenceformat
>  [eqref]
>  [left=\bgroup\normal(,
>   right=)\egroup]

This was my first attempt, but it gave some trouble. I need to go back and 
check.

Aditya

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Aditya Mahajan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1200 bytes --]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:

> Le Thursday 13 March 2008 13:03:22 Aditya Mahajan, vous avez écrit :
>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the \in
>>> command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for example). I
>>> tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but without good
>>> results.
>>>
>>> I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
>>> Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
>>> any more...
>>
>> I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
>> This is what I use:
>>
>> \definereferenceformat  [doeqref]   [left=(,right=)]
>> \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
>>
>> And then \eqref[tag]..
>>
>> Aditya
>
> Thank you, I'll use this too! It could be useful to add an option to
> \definereferenceformat to get the same result. Is it hard to implement?
>
> And concerning the equation tag itself, I mean the one introduced by
> \placeformula, is there a way to have it always typeset in upshape?

\setupformulas    [numberstyle=normal]

Aditya

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Morgan Brassel]

> > \definereferenceformat
> >  [eqref]
> >  [left=\bgroup\normal(,
> >   right=)\egroup]
>
> This was my first attempt, but it gave some trouble. I need to go back and
> check.
>
> Aditya

I now realize that my first question was not very clear: what I need in fact 
is to typeset *all* references obtained by the \in command in upshape. For 
example, in {\it See \in{Figure}[fig:det] for details.}, I would like to 
see 'Figure 1' in upshape and the rest in italic. I tried:

\setupreferencing
  [left=\bgroup\normal,
   right=\egroup]

without success. Is there a way to achieve this without defining new reference 
formats?

Thanks in advance,
Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Wolfgang Schuster]

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:49:19 +0100
Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:

> 
> > > \definereferenceformat
> > >  [eqref]
> > >  [left=\bgroup\normal(,
> > >   right=)\egroup]
> >
> > This was my first attempt, but it gave some trouble. I need to go back and
> > check.
> >
> > Aditya
> 
> I now realize that my first question was not very clear: what I need in fact 
> is to typeset *all* references obtained by the \in command in upshape. For 
> example, in {\it See \in{Figure}[fig:det] for details.}, I would like to 
> see 'Figure 1' in upshape and the rest in italic. I tried:
> 
> \setupreferencing
>   [left=\bgroup\normal,
>    right=\egroup]
> 
> without success. Is there a way to achieve this without defining new reference 
> formats?

What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
following solution although it is better to define a new command.

\let\normalin\in

\definereferenceformat
  [figref]
  [left=\normal,
   text=\normal Figure,
   command=\normalin]

\let\in\figref

\starttext

\placefigure
  [here][fig:det]
  {Example}
  {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}

\it See \in[fig:det] for details.

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Morgan Brassel]

Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
> What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
> following solution although it is better to define a new command.
>
> \let\normalin\in
>
> \definereferenceformat
>   [figref]
>   [left=\normal,
>    text=\normal Figure,
>    command=\normalin]
>
> \let\in\figref
>
> \starttext
>
> \placefigure
>   [here][fig:det]
>   {Example}
>   {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}
>
> \it See \in[fig:det] for details.
>
> \stoptext
>
> Wolfgang

Thank you for your help, Wolfgang! I think I'll define a new \ref command 
similar to the one in LaTeX, with upshape number. But maybe a new option 
would be welcome? (just as for numberstyle=normal in \setupformulae). What do 
you think? Is it a bad idea? I'm just curious...

Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Wolfgang Schuster]

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:30 +0100
Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:

> Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
> > What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
> > following solution although it is better to define a new command.
> >
> > \let\normalin\in
> >
> > \definereferenceformat
> >   [figref]
> >   [left=\normal,
> >    text=\normal Figure,
> >    command=\normalin]
> >
> > \let\in\figref
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > \placefigure
> >   [here][fig:det]
> >   {Example}
> >   {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}
> >
> > \it See \in[fig:det] for details.
> >
> > \stoptext

> Thank you for your help, Wolfgang! I think I'll define a new \ref command 
> similar to the one in LaTeX, with upshape number. But maybe a new option 
> would be welcome? (just as for numberstyle=normal in \setupformulae). What do 
> you think? Is it a bad idea? I'm just curious...

A new command to set the style for the number is OK but you need also
one for the text but this need to be done by Hans because it is not
possible to change the style for the predefined command in, at ... with
the current implementation.

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Jan-Erik Hägglöf]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wolfgang Schuster skrev:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:30 +0100
> Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
>>> What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
>>> following solution although it is better to define a new command.
>>>
>>> \let\normalin\in
>>>
>>> \definereferenceformat
>>>   [figref]
>>>   [left=\normal,
>>>    text=\normal Figure,
>>>    command=\normalin]
>>>
>>> \let\in\figref
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>>
>>> \placefigure
>>>   [here][fig:det]
>>>   {Example}
>>>   {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}
>>>
>>> \it See \in[fig:det] for details.
>>>
>>> \stoptext
> 
>> Thank you for your help, Wolfgang! I think I'll define a new \ref command 
>> similar to the one in LaTeX, with upshape number. But maybe a new option 
>> would be welcome? (just as for numberstyle=normal in \setupformulae). What do 
>> you think? Is it a bad idea? I'm just curious...
> 
> A new command to set the style for the number is OK but you need also
> one for the text but this need to be done by Hans because it is not
> possible to change the style for the predefined command in, at ... with
> the current implementation.
> 
> Wolfgang
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> 
Hi!

As a new Context user (former LateX) from Sweden according to the above
discussion about references style to figures. I have a following
question. How do I customize the appearance of the figure text, I mean
for example:
Under every figure there is : Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and so on.
How do I make it like this : Picture 1, Picture 2, Picture 3 or
Picture 1a .....1b    and such.?
In the swedish translation there is "Figur 1......."
I understand that it has to do with defining my own kind of \definefloat
or similar.

Best Regards

Janneman

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH24Yr/zRis+sQPvARAltuAKCRX8yebwmD1hUvOrO0lToDea+RowCgp1/E
QuGKQMpRfcnoMSU0lXkVE28=
=wSRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Johan Sandblom]

I believe the easy way is

\mainlanguage{sv]

which also has lots of other useful side effects.

Johan, also from Sweden

2008/3/15, Jan-Erik Hägglöf <janerik.hagglof@bredband.net>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  Wolfgang Schuster skrev:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:30 +0100
>  > Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:
>  >
>  >> Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
>  >>> What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
>  >>> following solution although it is better to define a new command.
>  >>>
>  >>> \let\normalin\in
>  >>>
>  >>> \definereferenceformat
>  >>>   [figref]
>  >>>   [left=\normal,
>  >>>    text=\normal Figure,
>  >>>    command=\normalin]
>  >>>
>  >>> \let\in\figref
>  >>>
>  >>> \starttext
>  >>>
>  >>> \placefigure
>  >>>   [here][fig:det]
>  >>>   {Example}
>  >>>   {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}
>  >>>
>  >>> \it See \in[fig:det] for details.
>  >>>
>  >>> \stoptext
>  >
>  >> Thank you for your help, Wolfgang! I think I'll define a new \ref command
>  >> similar to the one in LaTeX, with upshape number. But maybe a new option
>  >> would be welcome? (just as for numberstyle=normal in \setupformulae). What do
>  >> you think? Is it a bad idea? I'm just curious...
>  >
>  > A new command to set the style for the number is OK but you need also
>  > one for the text but this need to be done by Hans because it is not
>  > possible to change the style for the predefined command in, at ... with
>  > the current implementation.
>  >
>  > Wolfgang
>  > ___________________________________________________________________________________
>  > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>  >
>  > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>  > webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>  > archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>  > wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>  > ___________________________________________________________________________________
>  >
>
> Hi!
>
>  As a new Context user (former LateX) from Sweden according to the above
>  discussion about references style to figures. I have a following
>  question. How do I customize the appearance of the figure text, I mean
>  for example:
>  Under every figure there is : Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and so on.
>  How do I make it like this : Picture 1, Picture 2, Picture 3 or
>  Picture 1a .....1b    and such.?
>  In the swedish translation there is "Figur 1......."
>  I understand that it has to do with defining my own kind of \definefloat
>  or similar.
>
>  Best Regards
>
>  Janneman
>
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>  iD8DBQFH24Yr/zRis+sQPvARAltuAKCRX8yebwmD1hUvOrO0lToDea+RowCgp1/E
>  QuGKQMpRfcnoMSU0lXkVE28=
>  =wSRD
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>  If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
>  maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>  webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>  archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>  wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>  ___________________________________________________________________________________
>


-- 
Johan Sandblom, MD PhD
m +46735521477  Sweden
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
- Bertrand Russell
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Jan-Erik Hägglöf]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Johan Sandblom skrev:
> I believe the easy way is
> 
> \mainlanguage{sv]
> 
> which also has lots of other useful side effects.
> 
> Johan, also from Sweden
> 
> 2008/3/15, Jan-Erik Hägglöf <janerik.hagglof@bredband.net>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>  Hash: SHA1
>>
>>  Wolfgang Schuster skrev:
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:30:30 +0100
>>  > Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> Le Friday 14 March 2008 09:00:49 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
>>  >>> What do you want seems to be not possible but you could use the
>>  >>> following solution although it is better to define a new command.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \let\normalin\in
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \definereferenceformat
>>  >>>   [figref]
>>  >>>   [left=\normal,
>>  >>>    text=\normal Figure,
>>  >>>    command=\normalin]
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \let\in\figref
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \starttext
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \placefigure
>>  >>>   [here][fig:det]
>>  >>>   {Example}
>>  >>>   {\blackrule[width=3cm,height=3cm]}
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \it See \in[fig:det] for details.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> \stoptext
>>  >
>>  >> Thank you for your help, Wolfgang! I think I'll define a new \ref command
>>  >> similar to the one in LaTeX, with upshape number. But maybe a new option
>>  >> would be welcome? (just as for numberstyle=normal in \setupformulae). What do
>>  >> you think? Is it a bad idea? I'm just curious...
>>  >
>>  > A new command to set the style for the number is OK but you need also
>>  > one for the text but this need to be done by Hans because it is not
>>  > possible to change the style for the predefined command in, at ... with
>>  > the current implementation.
>>  >
>>  > Wolfgang
>>  > ___________________________________________________________________________________
>>  > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>>  >
>>  > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>>  > webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>>  > archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>>  > wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>>  > ___________________________________________________________________________________
>>  >
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>  As a new Context user (former LateX) from Sweden according to the above
>>  discussion about references style to figures. I have a following
>>  question. How do I customize the appearance of the figure text, I mean
>>  for example:
>>  Under every figure there is : Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and so on.
>>  How do I make it like this : Picture 1, Picture 2, Picture 3 or
>>  Picture 1a .....1b    and such.?
>>  In the swedish translation there is "Figur 1......."
>>  I understand that it has to do with defining my own kind of \definefloat
>>  or similar.
>>
>>  Best Regards
>>
>>  Janneman
>>
>>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>  Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>>  iD8DBQFH24Yr/zRis+sQPvARAltuAKCRX8yebwmD1hUvOrO0lToDea+RowCgp1/E
>>  QuGKQMpRfcnoMSU0lXkVE28=
>>  =wSRD
>>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>>  If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>>
>>  maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>>  webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>>  archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>>  wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>>  ___________________________________________________________________________________
>>
> 
> 
Good to have more pals from sweden!

Thanks for the answer, actually it was not what I meant.
I already use \mainlanguage[sv], but how do you customize so it appears
like: Bild 1 , Bild 2, ...... or  whatever 1 whatever 2 .....  or maybe
if you want to referencing to subfigures like whatever 1a  whatever 1b ....?

Thanks in Advance

Best Regards

Janneman -- Örebro - sweden


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH25Kb/zRis+sQPvARApFAAKC+TUUkQObvJwQQPvkjNP86tCH3CgCgjRZI
mcVAhziSRr0JkjOU2otjqT4=
=Eo0R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Wolfgang Schuster]

> Good to have more pals from sweden!
> 
> Thanks for the answer, actually it was not what I meant.
> I already use \mainlanguage[sv], but how do you customize so it appears
> like: Bild 1 , Bild 2, ...... or  whatever 1 whatever 2 .....  or maybe

\setuplabeltext[sv][figure=Bild ]

> if you want to referencing to subfigures like whatever 1a  whatever 1b ....?

\placefigure[here][fig:dummy]
  {\startcombination[2*1]
     {\externalfigure[dummy]}{a}
     {\externalfigure[dummy]}{b}
   \stopcombination}

See \in{figure}{a}[fig:dummy] and \in{figure}{b}[fig:dummy].

Greetings
Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape

[Jan-Erik Hägglöf]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wolfgang Schuster skrev:
>> Good to have more pals from sweden!
>>
>> Thanks for the answer, actually it was not what I meant.
>> I already use \mainlanguage[sv], but how do you customize so it appears
>> like: Bild 1 , Bild 2, ...... or  whatever 1 whatever 2 .....  or maybe
> 
> \setuplabeltext[sv][figure=Bild ]
> 
>> if you want to referencing to subfigures like whatever 1a  whatever 1b ....?
> 
> \placefigure[here][fig:dummy]
>   {\startcombination[2*1]
>      {\externalfigure[dummy]}{a}
>      {\externalfigure[dummy]}{b}
>    \stopcombination}
> 
> See \in{figure}{a}[fig:dummy] and \in{figure}{b}[fig:dummy].
> 
> Greetings
> Wolfgang
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> 

Just Great!
Many thanks, it is good to to have you around!

Janneman - Örebro - Sweden




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH2+go/zRis+sQPvARAgszAKDEanNAprgNVuj49C4432GlBEMgIACg4qp7
aKqRPDNCxystR4CtZpnXH10=
=Im34
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________