ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* References with or without interaction
@ 2008-04-06  9:48 Morgan Brassel
  2008-04-06 18:59 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Morgan Brassel @ 2008-04-06  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

Hi everyone,

I noticed what seems to be a lack of coherence when typesetting references 
with interaction enabled. Look at the example below:

\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
See \in{figure}[fig:a]. {\it See \in{figure}[fig:a].}
\placefigure
   [][fig:a]
   {A caption.}
   {HELLO}
\stoptext

When interaction is enabled, the two references are typeset bold and 
upshape. When it's not, the first one is upshape, the other is italic. 
This can lead to overfull hbox when turning on interaction, and this is 
quite unintuitive. Is there a reason why it is so in ConTeXt?

Best regards,
Morgan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-06 19:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-06  9:48 References with or without interaction Morgan Brassel
2008-04-06 18:59 ` Hans Hagen
2008-04-06 19:13   ` Morgan Brassel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).