From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/39944 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: first steps Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <47FC0062.24710.33BE687@wwl.musensturm.de> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207689908 24606 80.91.229.12 (8 Apr 2008 21:25:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:25:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Apr 08 23:25:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjLK0-0004UZ-SC for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:25:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FE81FB89; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:24:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22243-02-2; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDF61FB7E; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741BA1FB7E for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22243-02 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A30E1FB6B for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.20] (frnk-590d1a58.pool.einsundeins.de [89.13.26.88]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1JjLHu1uoE-0004YA; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:23:30 +0200 Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41, DE v4.41 R1) Content-description: Mail message body X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/72iRyhkQFRVfhh6f8E25p2qQu4/67pn9/w3k E9fmHifMlkGrXYcZ3LV06ykUWrtfkcts7IuH1IKCVYCIbw6BWr X4xVn2CS96olOt3QCvrSLlCy2ATrffF X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:39944 Archived-At: On 8 Apr 2008 at 12:00, ntg-context-request@ntg.nl wrote: > > I am using scite with the following command: > > texmfstart texexec --autopdf --luatex tst3.tex > > I simply have no idea. I do not understand why windows > would object to closing a file that doesn't exist (not even > how it could be possible for an opened file to not exist). > > It could be a simple matter of a missing file that somehow > luatex fails to check for during opening so it is not discovered > until it attempts to close the file, but even if that is true, > I have no idea how to debug anything on windows. > > It could also be a (more complicated) problem triggered by > disk synchronisation issues in Windows itself. We have been > bitten by those before (what is your windows flavour?) Windows 2000 > In either case, someone else has to come up with tests and/or > fix attempts. The only advice I can give is to reinstall > context using the new minimals and see if that helps any. > > http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals This is a fresh installation. I installed it using 'context-setup-mswin.zip'. After some trials, I found that the example compiles ok without the TWO \eogonek commands. There were TWO fclose attempts in the logs, too. Can this be a hint? Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________