From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40749 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: letter Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:03:13 +0200 Message-ID: <481649A1.24708.E042D5@wwl.musensturm.de> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209412437 25366 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2008 19:53:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:53:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Apr 28 21:54:32 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JqZQd-0002bW-GY for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:54:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0901FBD5; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32348-03-6; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26B81FBCC; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748531FBCC for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00177-01-3 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.179]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28C21FB49 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.20] (fuld-590d1ecb.pool.einsundeins.de [89.13.30.203]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML25U-1JqZPQ1L0P-0001QU; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:53:08 +0200 Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41, DE v4.41 R1) Content-description: Mail message body X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5symNME7Qi2bb+o2gD7Hf2TMG+haMn5++ItO Gg7u3s+W2OqA6semRysUgOXdKC6Dn3bjffWCq3TuGJXcP3g1Tq XyMvGp/ZPPn40HPffFHQfRK0pXn6CrX X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40749 Archived-At: Hallo Wolfgang, it seems to me that referenzline, subject, foldmarks, etc, are about 4mm or 5mm to big (A4 paper). The foldmark for example should be 105mm from papertop. It is 110mm from top. The horizontal offset (3.5mm) of foldmarks ist to small. A laserprinter often is not able to print 5mm or more from paperedge. So the foldmarks are invisibel. Grusz, Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________