From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40791 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: letter Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:15:12 +0200 Message-ID: <48182A90.9023.256BDE@wwl.musensturm.de> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209535587 8893 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2008 06:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:06:27 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Apr 30 08:07:03 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jr5T5-0003vp-6w for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:07:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B51FBBD; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21537-01-5; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:05:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861441FB72; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:05:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A41FB6B for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:05:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21116-02-2 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758451FB72 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.20] (frnk-590d0205.pool.einsundeins.de [89.13.2.5]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML2xA-1Jr5R23kJ4-0005KH; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:04:57 +0200 Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41, DE v4.41 R1) Content-description: Mail message body X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ttw2CIsOUUgV0AO84pcnVvmE2CrkcTIv07KM U3JyrpgfKqwVxSuP2g5yoY+6AABbzPGUQdj/l9Tlx1H4Rt+rUg OP5/nthzxs3OYZnU8iufPJt0ppOQ0mS X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40791 Archived-At: > To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" > Message-ID: > <115224fb0804282319m769d86d5k7ac80890ede76cd8@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > it seems to me that referenzline, subject, foldmarks, etc, are > about > > 4mm or 5mm to big (A4 paper). The foldmark for example should be > > 105mm from papertop. It is 110mm from top. > > The horizontal offset (3.5mm) of foldmarks ist to small. A > > laserprinter often is not able to print 5mm or more from > paperedge. > > So the foldmarks are invisibel. > > I never measured the real values and it should be simple > whitespace > problem somewhere in the code. Have you found that whitespace? Aren't the foldmarks positioned in absolute values relative to the page? There is no whitespace involved, isn't it? So I don't understand this 5mm offset at all. Are your vertical foldmark positions ok? > The address field was wrong placed and I corrected it, the place for > the > referenece line should work but I change the position dependen on > the > alternative for the layout and the value in the default letterstyle > is ignored > at the moment. > > Don't what do you mean about the subject, the position is controlled > with > the normal page layout. But the bodyspace depends on the space occupied by the header (addresfield, referenceline etc.). Wrong? > I could change the values for the foldmarks, I corrected the > position > already and it got them at least on my own printer. You could try > to > play with \setupletterstyle[topmark,botmark,cutmark][hoffset=...] > and > give me a value that did work for your printer. 6mm should be enough for laserprinters. Grusz, Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________