From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/41819 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bug in context/luatex Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: <485CA4E2.5070505@elvenkind.com> References: <68bfdc900806202117g44ce0968s6186396cda7a170e@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214031170 341 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2008 06:52:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dev-luatex@ntg.nl To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Jun 21 08:53:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9wyZ-0003qJ-Mv for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:53:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1641FC7B; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13166-01-2; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1601FC78; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152101FC78; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11474-03-2; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC4E1FBB8; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.10.0.6] (boo.demon.nl [82.161.175.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5L6pE03087530; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:51:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from taco@elvenkind.com) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) In-Reply-To: <68bfdc900806202117g44ce0968s6186396cda7a170e@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:41819 Archived-At: Yue Wang wrote: > Hi, Hans: > > pdftex and LuaTeX produce different results with the following source > file. Please check. Whatever it is exactly (no lbr on my home machine so I can not try), this is likely a problem with context mkiv, not the luatex engine. Mkiv usually reads afm files and reencodes the font to (partial) unicode, instead of using the traditional tfm files. You could experiment with \ctxlua { fonts.define.method = 2 } at the very top of your file. Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________