From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/42519 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Rolf Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Latest beta + LuaTeX Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <487E4812.2090700@gmx.net> References: <487D07DE.1040208@elvenkind.com> <487DE696.2050904@elvenkind.com> <487DF22B.9070501@gmx.net> <487E0700.1020204@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216235650 27443 80.91.229.12 (16 Jul 2008 19:14:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:14:10 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jul 16 21:14:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KJCSY-0002CO-09 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:14:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080891FD04; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:13:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23198-02-5; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72EF1FCE8; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0E51FC7B for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23198-02-4 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 761821FC9B for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2008 19:12:17 -0000 Original-Received: from i5387C1D6.versanet.de (EHLO [192.168.1.3]) [83.135.193.214] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 16 Jul 2008 21:12:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #24293357 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+GDQ9e5JeGVc9mfSgkRbEatCPaXbhHOuPrX5R02S lAOB+bLnZmjws2 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <487E0700.1020204@elvenkind.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.63 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:42519 Archived-At: Taco Hoekwater schrieb: > > Peter Rolf wrote: >> Taco Hoekwater schrieb: >>> Taco Hoekwater wrote: >>>> Thanks, for the heads up. The luatex trunk is a bit in flux at the >>>> moment. We are trying to squeeze the previous half year of pdftex and >>>> texlive development into it, and it takes some effort. >>> For the repository users of luatex: The trunk seems to be >>> compiling and running again. >>> >> good news :) >> >> will test asap. aside from one problem with png transparency (when the >> pdf is included, the picture shows the wrong background color) the >> luatex trunk (12-07-2008) works fine here. > > (if you know how) can you try the same thing with pdftex 1.40.3 vs. > 1.40.8 as well? There was a bugfix in pdftex 1.40.6 for Transparant > images cf. this bug report: > > http://sarovar.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=896&group_id=106&atid=493 > > and it is possible that it has side-effects. > thanks Mojca. i found a pool that worked. the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end): pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3). if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color in the transparent area. mh, who to blame? the producer or the collector? as mentioned: i have an old version of that example pdf (made with luatex 0.22) that works ok with the rc1. i'm puzzled. > (if you don't know how) maybe you can send me the file(s)? > > Best wishes, > Taco > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________