It's better with the attachment...

Renaud Aubin a écrit :
> Hi Folks !
>
> I'm currently writting a technical report in which I need to type some 
> XML an non-XML text.
>
> Sample file (xml_test.tex):
> I have some custom XML text (trivial) + a not-so-complicated xsl 
> transformation (a part is included within the test file). I know there 
> is verb-xml but... I need to improve it to support xpath expr. More 
> over, I want to preserve the initial indentation. The point is now, how 
> to improve verb-xml to support xpath expressions ? I'm working with Mark 
> II... Should I switch to Mark IV if I want to write a new XML verbatim 
> support (with lua)?
>
> + the bonus question: I want to add some support for the RelaxNG Compact 
> syntax, should I follow the procedure described on the wiki or switch to 
> Mark IV ?
>
> The deadline for this technical report: end of october...
>
> Regards,
>
> Renaud
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
>