From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/45099 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pablo_Rodr=EDguez?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Embedded fonts question Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:01:06 +0100 Message-ID: <490431D2.3090103@web.de> References: <72FF8678-F9E1-4C5F-BBD2-0C9E9C029340@trichotomic.net> <49036307.8020106@web.de> <54F3AE97-94F9-4F2A-8C27-F06CDE051982@trichotomic.net> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225008179 13470 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2008 08:02:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:02:59 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 26 09:04:00 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ku0bP-0002Zd-NQ for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:03:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3957F1FB29; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:02:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17707-02-8; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6564B1FB30; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAF11FB29 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17707-02-7 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de (fmmailgate03.web.de [217.72.192.234]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA581FB30 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5722CF302E9B for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [81.44.163.41] (helo=[192.168.1.33]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.109 #226) id 1Ku0Yh-0007ZB-00 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:01:11 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080926) In-Reply-To: <54F3AE97-94F9-4F2A-8C27-F06CDE051982@trichotomic.net> X-Sender: oinos@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+YWTkJhkJqUuovZJ3FOvhLNu9+kwJLJqXGRIsA LUSUznyZe2O23mfOKW55vjSYrDvzSwFYgOkXPxZCbFjpWaQih9 5rLZ9DeqE= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:45099 Archived-At: David Wooten wrote: > On Oct 25, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Pablo Rodr=EDguez wrote: > = >> David Wooten wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> A sad story: My context-typeset dissertation was printed/ = >>> distributed by >>> a POD publisher with aweful typographical errors (like all commas = >>> in the >>> main font being replaced by an ff ligature). Obviously the printer >>> didn't check their results. The file /reads/ fine both for me and the >>> publisher, but the printer let us know that the file is unprintable = >>> due >>> to problems with fonts not being embedded (why they originally = >>> printed >>> an "unprintable" file I'll never know). >>> >>> [...] > = > Thanks, Pablo and Luigi, > = > I was able to run pdffonts and check my file, it agrees with adobe = > acrobat in saying that all fonts are embedded. So....I'm going to send = > the publisher the current file and see what happens. I'm only 98% sure = > that it's exactly the same as the original file I sent, so I am = > slightly hopeful that it will work out better. Hi David, I don't know whether this will work, but I think that the best option = would be to try to get the PDF files both from the publisher and the = printer and the check whether they are really the same (using md5sum or = sha1sum) and then check the different file(s) with pdffonts. If the fonts are there, somehow the PDF interpreter that printed the = dissertation wasn't able to read the font itself or its mapping. I hope it helps, Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________