From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/45340 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Multicolumn itemizations - again... Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:29:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4912E313.4050708@wxs.nl> References: <20081105200906.GU2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <20081105203929.GW2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <4912AD67.5070804@wxs.nl> <20081106090454.GY2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225974655 8957 80.91.229.12 (6 Nov 2008 12:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:30:55 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Nov 06 13:31:56 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ky41k-0000ec-Pt for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:31:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916CF1FBBD; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:30:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31578-02-5; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:29:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93B81FB14; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:29:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300931FADF for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:29:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30081-03-5 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:29:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678211FB14 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:29:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.112] (unverified [10.100.1.11]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 7273-1840426 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:29:06 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) In-Reply-To: <20081106090454.GY2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> X-Originating-IP: 10.100.1.11 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:45340 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski wrote: > However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my > computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my > user page). [n=1] > Please do not think that I am angry at you, Hans, or anything like that; > I really admire your (and not only your) work with ConTeXt. But I am a > bit disappointed - and hope that itemizations will eventually work. And > now I guess I'll have to work this around in some nasty way (most > probably, I'll just do the only one-column itemization by hand). well, although tex can do a lot, there are limitations; column related stuff for instance is a matter of programming all possible aspects of it; and there can be conflicting demands > And you may be pretty sure that I will be a good beta-tester for the > itemization stuff - as I already told, I use itemizations a lot, > together with math, nesting itemizations, two-column ones etc. For the > purpose of testing any new things in this area I'm leaving the examples > on my user page, too. ok; but as mentioned before only mkiv will have improved itemizations > PS. Looking back at the steady progress of ConTeXt & luatex, I am pretty > sure that this _will_ be solved in finite time anyway, so I can just > \relax, wait and then test and provide feedback;). thanks Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________