ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: XeTeX and/or LuaTeX?
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:14:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49830B35.2000902@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4982D69C.5050101@gmail.com>

J.A.J. Pater wrote:

> And now on this list there is a lot of talk about LuaTeX and Mark IV.
> So I wonder: Is it possible to use MarkIV and XeTeX engine at the same 
> time?
> And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?

you could use both at the same time, but xetex uses mkii and luatex uses 
mkiv

in principle mkii is frozen so new features and improvements will only 
happen in mkiv

concerning bidi: luatex does this natively (based on omega/aleph code) 
while xetex does it the etex way which has some limitations

(since mkiv/luatex is tested extensively in the oriental tex project it 
probably makes more sense to use mkiv)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-30 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-30 10:29 J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-30 10:39 ` Yue Wang
2009-01-30 11:12   ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-30 11:20     ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-01-30 14:15     ` Hans Hagen
2009-01-30 23:14       ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-30 23:50         ` Hans Hagen
2009-01-31  9:33           ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-31 10:30           ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-31 12:21           ` Mojca Miklavec
2009-01-31 13:37             ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-31 18:54             ` J.A.J. Pater
2009-01-31 21:16               ` Mojca Miklavec
2009-02-01 12:07                 ` Hans Hagen
2009-02-01 12:04             ` Hans Hagen
2009-01-30 14:14 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2009-01-30 22:08 ` Mojca Miklavec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49830B35.2000902@wxs.nl \
    --to=pragma@wxs.nl \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).