From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/47141 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: XeTeX and/or LuaTeX? Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:07:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4985906D.5010601@wxs.nl> References: <4982D69C.5050101@gmail.com> <68bfdc900901300239p239c4a43q5fc5d2b6c84e269b@mail.gmail.com> <4982E0A7.7060204@gmail.com> <49830B8A.8050008@wxs.nl> <498389D7.1080006@gmail.com> <49839232.2010301@wxs.nl> <6faad9f00901310421m7dcc94a4i8e6bced0c894408@mail.gmail.com> <49849E4C.4010109@gmail.com> <6faad9f00901311316k2986598dq58fc6a1fe46e77e3@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233490130 23043 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 12:08:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:08:50 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Feb 01 13:10:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTb9H-0004ie-A1 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:10:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25901FDE1; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:08:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23577-04-3; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47661FDC8; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB001FDC8 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01059-02-2 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter1-til.mf.surf.net (filter1-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.217]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A11B1FC57 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by filter1-til.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n11C79sL020448 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:07:09 +0100 Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 7730-1840426 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:07:09 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: <6faad9f00901311316k2986598dq58fc6a1fe46e77e3@mail.gmail.com> X-Originating-IP: 10.100.1.100 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=83.247.100.17; country=NL; region=16; city=Dronten; latitude=52.5333; longitude=5.7167; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5333,5.7167&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 173312879 - cbc8dbce725f X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.217 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:47141 Archived-At: Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:54 PM, J.A.J. Pater wrote: >> My guess was incorrect. >> I copy-pasted the underneath text into my test file and I got good results. >> No tXeTnoC. >> So here it just works like a charm. > > I'm sorry. I accidentally commented out \setcharactermirroring[1] > while switching between XeTeX and LuaTeX. So this time just for fun: > XeTeX doesn't know textdir command, so I commented out both textdir > and setcharactermirroring. And then you get XtEConT with XeTeX :) :) > :) xetex uses the etex bidi method (\beginL .. \endL and such) > I used the wrong set of direction-switching commands, though it's > still interesting that XeTeX and LuaTeX both accept input, but > generate completely different results. (\pardir without \textdir has > no influence in mkiv while it changes word stacking direction in > XeTeX.) well, since they both use different rl machinery it can never be the same; Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________