From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/50765 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Seeking a Deeper ConTeXt: Questions for Initializing Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:59:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4A1ACE8E.6030204@wxs.nl> References: <4c1f1f860905241017s40033f7crde553d358a24b57f@mail.gmail.com> <4c1f1f860905250930g2e44f973y335be816c2883981@mail.gmail.com> <4A1AC9B8.3050807@wxs.nl> <4c1f1f860905250953g26e09b99k8e150141176fc39@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243270865 25596 80.91.229.12 (25 May 2009 17:01:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:01:05 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon May 25 19:00:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M8dXb-0007oH-IY for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:00:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771EE1FB6D; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07456-03; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:00:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119CA1FD72; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:00:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44621FD72 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:00:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07213-04 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (filter2-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.70]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077501FD62 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n4PGxtar032695 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:59:55 +0200 Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 12808-1840426 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 18:59:55 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4c1f1f860905250953g26e09b99k8e150141176fc39@mail.gmail.com> X-Originating-IP: 10.100.1.100 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=83.247.100.17; country=NL; region=15; city=Almelo; latitude=52.3500; longitude=6.6667; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.3500,6.6667&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 231420406 - 5f411bc0c606 - 20090525 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.70 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:50765 Archived-At: John Haltiwanger wrote: > Okay, but that does imply that an organization can set up an environment and > expect its members to use it. indeed, of seek help in doing so (not much different from setting up a housestyle for word ro whatever) > I'm not sure what you mean by a representation of a node list for a > paragraph (I am new to TeX, remember), but I am thinking more along the > lines of extracting Title, Author, and the content. Typesetting is not the > goal, as XML is for computers not people. etc .. the result of typeseting (kind of application xml which actually much of the xml around is) > The gain of XML is participation in the semantic web and concordance with > many new data keeping rules in governments and organizations. that should happen with the source, ot the typeset result - structured document in xml format - rendering to the web using xslt and xhtml and css - rendering for paper using tex - analysing for whatever purpose using xml toolkits > The input is actually a specific version of Word. This is converted to XML. > In the case of LaTeX, the LaTeX is converted to Word and then to XML. i'd then go from latex directly to xml (given enough structure) but even workflows like word -> xml -> context are quite doable Hans ps most of our work here involves making styles and going from word/xml -> pdf (either or not reassembled) using context ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________