Re: bold math

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>>> and has no influence in mkiv. (The
>>>> workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
>>>> difference.)
>> in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional
>> vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but
>> symbols is a 'whole font' issue
> 
> I agree ... there are lots of other symbols.
> 
> I noticed the "tex-bi" in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta
> version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably
> exactly the same as "math-bi".
> 
> Do you plan to misuse "tex-bi" or to to define mathematics.make_font (
> "lmroman10-boldmath" ... ) for bold math then?

currently only math tf is defined (fam 0) and we will also have math bf 
(fam 1); mostly a matter of definitions but i was not in the mood to 
figure out all the bold fonts involved/needed

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________