From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/51605 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: mkiv structure Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:04:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4A4E0FD7.4040903@wxs.nl> References: <4A36001B.8000307@wxs.nl> <200907022034.51459.alan.braslau@cea.fr> <4A4D25E5.7070105@wxs.nl> <200907031012.35046.alan.braslau@cea.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246629918 19824 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2009 14:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl To: Alan BRASLAU Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jul 03 16:05:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MMjNy-0001gJ-Ar for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:05:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0291FC00; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:05:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24099-03-2; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D599A1FBB8; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3041FBAC for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24099-03 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter1-nij.mf.surf.net (filter1-nij.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.152]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1521FBCC for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by filter1-nij.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n63E487S028561 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:04:09 +0200 Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 23396-1840426 for multiple; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:04:08 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) In-Reply-To: <200907031012.35046.alan.braslau@cea.fr> X-Originating-IP: 10.100.1.100 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=83.247.100.17; country=NL; region=15; city=Almelo; latitude=52.3500; longitude=6.6667; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.3500,6.6667&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 255154399 - fb24147192c0 - 20090703 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.152 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:51605 Archived-At: Alan BRASLAU wrote: > In my understanding, \part serves to delimit > logical sections of related chapters, not volumes. > Maybe I am wrong in this interpretation; > maybe \part is to be used to delimit volumes. > Nevertheless, it should be relatively simple > for the basic user to be able to select the desired behavior > without having to acquire an understanding of the inner workings > such as prefixsets and sectionsegments. there will be presets but i had no time yet to make them > Obsolete in mkii? > Shouldn't basic use (read standard users) > treat source text transparently > between mkii and mkiv? no, this is one of the few places where there will be a difference; we have way more control now (also to the detail of setting up styles for each separator in a composed number) but that comes at a price; i don't want to complicate the mkiv code with too many compatibility hacks Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________