* Command version of \em
@ 2009-08-28 9:49 Matthijs Kooijman
2009-08-28 10:01 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-08-28 10:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthijs Kooijman @ 2009-08-28 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 281 bytes --]
Hi all,
is there any "command version" of \em, like there is for \bold and friends? I
can write either \bold{foo} of {\bold foo}, but only {\em foo} and not
\em{foo}. Is there any way to do this already, or should I just define \emph
myself or something like that?
Gr.
Matthijs
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Command version of \em
2009-08-28 9:49 Command version of \em Matthijs Kooijman
@ 2009-08-28 10:01 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-08-28 10:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2009-08-28 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 28.08.2009 um 11:49 schrieb Matthijs Kooijman:
> Hi all,
>
> is there any "command version" of \em, like there is for \bold and
> friends? I
> can write either \bold{foo} of {\bold foo}, but only {\em foo} and not
> \em{foo}. Is there any way to do this already, or should I just
> define \emph
> myself or something like that?
\definealternativestyle[emph][\em][]
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Command version of \em
2009-08-28 9:49 Command version of \em Matthijs Kooijman
2009-08-28 10:01 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2009-08-28 10:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
2009-08-28 11:06 ` Hans Hagen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2009-08-28 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there any "command version" of \em, like there is for \bold and friends?
I couldn't find such a command, but
\definealternativestyle [emphasis] [\em] []
will define \emphasis{foo} analogous to \bold{foo}.
Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Command version of \em
2009-08-28 10:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
@ 2009-08-28 11:06 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2009-08-28 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is there any "command version" of \em, like there is for \bold and friends?
>
> I couldn't find such a command, but
>
> \definealternativestyle [emphasis] [\em] []
>
> will define \emphasis{foo} analogous to \bold{foo}.
i can add it but only if someone collects the proper names in other
languages
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-28 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-28 9:49 Command version of \em Matthijs Kooijman
2009-08-28 10:01 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-08-28 10:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
2009-08-28 11:06 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).