symbolset

symbolset

[Aditya Mahajan]

How do I see all symbols in a symbolset. With

\starttext
\showsymbolset[uni]
\showsymbolset[nav]
\stoptext

I get a blank page.

Aditya

Re: symbolset

[Taco Hoekwater]

Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> How do I see all symbols in a symbolset. With

Symbol sets do not have a strict relation to file names.
"symb-nav.tex", for instance, defines three symbol sets:
"navigation 1", "navigation 2" , "navigation 3".

   \starttext
   \showsymbolset[navigation 1]
   \showsymbolset[navigation 2]
   \showsymbolset[navigation 3]
   \stoptext

IIRC, some of the Unicode symbol sets require commercial fonts
(from MacOS X).

Cheers, Taco

Re: symbolset

[Aditya Mahajan]

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

>
>
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> How do I see all symbols in a symbolset. With
>
> Symbol sets do not have a strict relation to file names.
> "symb-nav.tex", for instance, defines three symbol sets:
> "navigation 1", "navigation 2" , "navigation 3".
>
>   \starttext
>   \showsymbolset[navigation 1]
>   \showsymbolset[navigation 2]
>   \showsymbolset[navigation 3]
>   \stoptext
>
> IIRC, some of the Unicode symbol sets require commercial fonts
> (from MacOS X).

Thanks. I will look in the sym-* files for names of other symbolsets.

Aditya

Re: symbolset

[Hans van der Meer]

On Jun 28, 2006, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

> How do I see all symbols in a symbolset. With
>
> \starttext
> \showsymbolset[uni]
> \showsymbolset[nav]
> \stoptext
>
> I get a blank page.

I did this and the wasy symbols come out nicely:
\usemodule[symb-was]
\showsymbolset [wasy general]

What I can think of: a module that has to be loaded as in the above  
example.
Hope this helps.

Hans van der Meer

Re: symbolset

[Adam Lindsay]

Taco Hoekwater wrote:

> IIRC, some of the Unicode symbol sets require commercial fonts
> (from MacOS X).

Eh, "require" is such a strong word... There are some placeholders in 
there, since the Mac OS X fonts were easy (for me) to get. The XeTeX 
code that named the fonts explicitly (hmm, bad old assumption now...) 
was set off in a conditional in the hopes that a more general solution 
would come along...
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
  Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
  Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: symbolset

[Taco Hoekwater]

Adam Lindsay wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> 
> 
>>IIRC, some of the Unicode symbol sets require commercial fonts
>>(from MacOS X).
> 
> Eh, "require" is such a strong word... There are some placeholders in 
> there, since the Mac OS X fonts were easy (for me) to get. The XeTeX 
> code that named the fonts explicitly (hmm, bad old assumption now...) 
> was set off in a conditional in the hopes that a more general solution 
> would come along...

When the dust from eurotex2006 settles down, I hope to have a look at
this. I have some half-finished fonts for unicode symbols lying around
that could perhaps be extended. Remind me in a month or so?

Cheers, taco