From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/55379 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Manuel P." Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Thoughts on ConTeXt: ditched Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4B39FCC5.9080500@gmail.com> References: <4B378347.8020700@gmail.com> <4B38B634.5000501@gmail.com> <87d41y7axj.wl%berend@pobox.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262091478 2817 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 12:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:57:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Dec 29 13:57:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPbe2-0003XG-3h for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B31C9BC4; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Fvhx6s08Favd; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BE9C9B87; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F55FC9B87 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id u5SR6mLHmDJQ for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE49C9B66 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so9745102fxm.34 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:57:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J9zEiDeqaYDzh3tAxEB/Vhkm1WR1TbmrQY5RSgebFkk=; b=NLbtPVPYjfkiEgefMjc2FYbnGREbgt4mkMijhtCEcVNZys9Vtd16swxbKApc5d75vB 9ZQR89yt4Adi9II2comZx1kMC4hEZKIoxCuWtXE8pnZOkGAFz2H9cezLJ3gjGjiYcI4v z76AI4V1iZxnfuGmKgTstM0347hJmJBcO8QT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hl0Gv7p48of0TKXLL6/Nl0TWhVQT8bkTqj4nVc8xZUDeh1cTYub5an6Wqe3eKJRIL4 LqUt9uBkppuuieAocbMJRA2kGGsRsbUvzDyPR/SHkv2wGbzWn3LZe9cU3jxHwpyt8Huo eTD9FdCBoomBjtc8ojxZfd2fewn29wSkS/Qok= Original-Received: by 10.103.78.36 with SMTP id f36mr6744408mul.69.1262091461204; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:57:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?80.104.86.136? (host136-86-dynamic.104-80-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [80.104.86.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm37030096mue.12.2009.12.29.04.57.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:57:40 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <87d41y7axj.wl%berend@pobox.com> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:55379 Archived-At: Il 29/12/2009 3.48, berend@pobox.com ha scritto: > Manuel> Another "problem" is the "fluidity" of ConTeXt: it changes > Manuel> rapidly and the documentation is left behind. > > Maybe for some things, but I'm using a manual from 2004 and from my > point of view very little has changed. > > I would say the interface is remarkably stable, so hopefully that > might be some encouragement to come back one day. > > Sure! -- Manuel P. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________