From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/55457 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Manuel P." Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Thoughts on ConTeXt: ditched Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4B4261CB.3060505@gmail.com> References: <4B378347.8020700@gmail.com> <4B38B634.5000501@gmail.com> <87d41y7axj.wl%berend@pobox.com> <4B39FCC5.9080500@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262689654 16091 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2010 11:07:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:07:34 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Jan 05 12:07:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NS7G2-0004rj-IW for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:07:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD37FC9ADD; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3pAmu+Ru8ShB; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744B4C9BCF; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4672AC9BCF for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hDO7NThKccXg for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DDFC9ADD for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:07:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2948769fxm.34 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:07:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I2RBpT4EU73XYBgWnBqfTNgoYDsvjzq8NtBYepPhD4Y=; b=IvV+5X9Rnl8pttc9wWPulHUhve/r9G0r2Ll4YvPiWglJvDqKmzUvsG5zv3yTPHCUCg 9OaR7Kfaz9AmbzDZS6GaKnxPWWxH2wolhiW+J1Xe8UmneS5MeJRk5LhiwYZHG9oHaDxj nrjfNNm7ZVwpt5OR2+/Gs1kH7/+xCXwFqTvy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cszB2kVCOScVk1jISRyHy196R35Bx7T0gnfZ2mC8sH/XoC6c8+rMs47dvCn9mh0uX+ bOgI4/iP0le0exMQyAfkTRuGfMeCwWid755aUlykQ2nbapHN112IdTpjoJcaV202p70a g8Jrz47oSf/m2lgZMVyb+Hj28wPEuPgbhDN0E= Original-Received: by 10.223.101.152 with SMTP id c24mr1629720fao.95.1262689639752; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:07:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?80.104.88.174? (host174-88-dynamic.104-80-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [80.104.88.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm6386506fxm.4.2010.01.05.03.07.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:07:17 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:55457 Archived-At: Il 03/01/2010 19.45, Piotr Kopszak ha scritto: > > Well, well, > > ConTeXt can help you if you give him a little love and don't try pull > all triggers at once. Having written my Ph.D. in LaTeX and published > couple of books in ConTeXT I can assure you, ConTeXt is surprisingly > better suited for "scientific" texts (oops sorry, I just mean text > with footnotes, bibliography, a couple of indexes, list of > illustrations, definitions whatever) even if you disregard its > typographic quality. That's of course my entirely subjective opinion. > > Piotr > > > I've several passions, and one of them is desktop publishing and design (although I'm still a newbie) so a more in-depth exploration of ConTeXt in some future is likely. -- Manuel P. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________