Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello Taco,
> 
> the following example (I need to admit that I'm not sure how to
> properly cite inproceedings) returns a different result in mkii and
> mkiv. My citation (the fields I use) is probably a bit wrong, but the
> results should be the same in my opinion. (Only mkii shows the year,
> in mkiv there's an extra space; the month is not shown anywhere,

Please try the attached patched version of bibl-num.tex, that should
give you the month back in mkii. (if it works, similar patches are
needed to the other files, of course).

> pubname is only shown  in mkii although it's probably not needed
> anyway since it's already the title (= booktitle in bibtex?) that
> takes that role. It's also not really clear to me why I need to use
> author and not artauthor, but well ...)

In hindsight, artauthor would have been better, but it would be
a bad idea to change that after all that time.

> It may be sensible to have some reference about which fields are
> sensible for what type of publication also among the ConTeXt manuals.

Well, for mkii I was aiming for the same fields as for bibtex,
(plus/minus the [art]author/[art]title differences). It just
so happens that I missed 'month' and perhaps others as well.

Best wishes,
Taco