Re: 10+ reasons why I still use MKII

[Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com>]

Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> 
>> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>>> 10.) Different square root shape/variant used:
>>>>
>>>> $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}$
>>>>
>>>> Original formula:
>>>> \startformula
>>>> \startcases
>>>>  \NC ρ_0, \NC for $i=0$, \NR
>>>>  \NC  ρ_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}
>>>>  \exp\biggl(-\frac{\left(x_j-μ_i\right)^2}{2σ_i^2}\biggr), \NC for 
>>>> $i\in\left\{1,2\right\}$. \NR
>>>> \stopcases
>>>> \stopformula
>>>> but I cannot reproduce the big difference it makes in original 
>>>> document on a smaller scale.
>>>
>>> Taco, is there a difference between the default math parameters for 
>>> MkIV?
>>
>> Hans now uses OpenType Math (sometimes faked) fonts always, and his
>> initial version of the reimplemenation of \big.... was wrong. But
>> I thought this had been fixed a few weeks ago.
> 
> I am using a month old version. I'll update and check again.
> 
> Mojca's question was regarding the shape of \sqrt.

Ah yes. Same problem, different glyph.

Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________