From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/58800 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: 10+ reasons why I still use MKII Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4BECDE57.3010802@elvenkind.com> References: <4BEAC60C.8070900@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273814625 7167 80.91.229.12 (14 May 2010 05:23:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 05:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Hans Hagen To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri May 14 07:23:43 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCnN8-0000vb-W8 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DEBC9B16; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id J1bnyWOWwpep; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CDFC9AFD; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E82C9AF5 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1XMGlCpzYyqw for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from plane.elvenkind.com (elvenknd.xs4all.nl [82.95.203.226]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D06C9AFD for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from glenlivet.elvenkind.com (glenlivet.elvenkind.com [10.10.0.6]) by plane.elvenkind.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCA980208A1; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:23:35 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090319) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:58800 Archived-At: Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> as i never used citations i don't know what you expect ... best ask Thomas >> what you should expect ... anyway, i'll make a template for the xml approach > > Does anyone else have an idea of whether \cite[a,b,c] should generate > [1,2,3] or [1-3]? I have an article at hand that has "[1], [2], [3]" > instead to be honest. I'm not sure, but [1-3] somehow doesn't appear > right to me. I have a feeling that each bib item needs to be cited > separately, but I may be wrong. It is a style thing: some journals want this, others that. In hyper-linked docs, you always need [1,2,3] because of the links. Best wishes, Taco ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________