Re: vim syntax highlighting in MKIV

[Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>]

Am 27.06.10 07:41, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Almost all the errors in t-vim over the years have due to trying to 
>> support kpse: directive. (The errors were not a fault of ConTeXt, but 
>> the way quotes are handled by cmd.exe and the various shells in *nix. 
>> I still haven't figured out a syntax that works with all shells). 
>> This makes me wonder whether it was a good idea to make vim module 
>> work out of the box. Perhaps a more robust alternative was to ask the 
>> uses to copy 2context.vim to $HOME/.vim/scripts/ and forget about 
>> getting mtxrun to locate the file. What do others think?
>
> In the spirit of MkIV, I have attempted to redo the vim module from 
> scratch.
>
> http://github.com/adityam/filter
>
> [...]
>
> * Most importantly, this only runs under MkIV. That is because 
> \doprocesslocalsetups is not defined in MkII.
>
> Hans, can you add the definition of \doprocesslocalsetups to MkII?

If you don't matter about performance you can use 
'\processcommacommand[...]\directsetup'

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________