From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/60954 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: subject kills bookmarks? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4C697E33.1090602@wxs.nl> References: <9ED6609A-8987-4B62-B1A6-7C8DCCF36EF5@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281982025 4358 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2010 18:07:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Steffen Wolfrum To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Aug 16 20:07:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol45O-0003mZ-Q8 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:07:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29408CA55C; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:07:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id icekk3sie3lA; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB2CA558; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D788CA558 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id f7GPs0PIRvwC for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter5-til.mf.surf.net (filter5-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.221]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3763CA40E for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (sc-162.r-213-125-29.schoolconnect.nu [213.125.29.162]) by filter5-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o7GI6sX9029158 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:06:55 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.100; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 4.3g4) with ESMTP id 6231-1713362 for multiple; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:04:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 ThunderBrowse/3.3.2 In-Reply-To: <9ED6609A-8987-4B62-B1A6-7C8DCCF36EF5@st.estfiles.de> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=11; city=Den Haag; latitude=52.0833; longitude=4.3000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.0833,4.3000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0xCT66SG5 - fee883c16a79 - 20100816 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.221 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:60954 Archived-At: On 15-8-2010 7:05, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Hi, > > Why does subject kill bookmarks when used as first entry? > See attached example. > > (I am not sure whether I misunderstood the structural logic that's used for bookmarks.) Well, they assume some structure indeed and start from a parent that has a higher order. Normally one will have more structure (introductions or whatever) and never start with a dangling subject. In a toc this goes unnoticed as there is no tree visualized there. I fixed it using a horrible hack that took me a whole afternoon of experimenting to cook up so this is the last thing I will do about bookmarks for a long time (esp such weird cases). Having a dangling one in for instance an appendix will show the problem as one will never know where it actually belongs to then. A better way would be to have a dedicated 'inject level zero bookmark here' command but it has a very low priority. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________