ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* What is the replacement for the 'stop_run' callback?
@ 2010-10-17 14:06 Tad Ashlock
  2010-10-17 16:24 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tad Ashlock @ 2010-10-17 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1582 bytes --]

Hi All,

I'm trying to update a ConTeXt module of mine.  It does some data gathering
during the ConTeXt run, and then processes it after the run is complete.
 This used to work last year:

local id, err = callback.register('stop_run', new_stop_run_function)

But now err is set to "callback 'stop_run' is frozen (actions performed at
the end of a run)".

I see from the mailing list archive that registering user callbacks was
disallowed in February of this year (2010).  I also saw some advice for
installing other new user processing (like 'pre_linebreak_filter'), but no
general advice for adapting to the lack of callbacks.  (
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100219.130524.b3857a0a.en.html)

After trying various approaches for a couple of hours, I'm calling for help.
:)

Here's what I ended up with:

\startluacode
print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST1')
local function after_run (head, groupcode)
    print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST2')
    return head, true
end
nodes.tasks.appendaction('finalizers','after','after_run')
\stopluacode
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext

In the output, I see the TEST1 line, but not the TEST2 line.

I don't know what "head" and "groupcode" are, but those seem to be the
expected parameters for an action.  I don't know why it returns "head,
true", but that was recommended in a posting (
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100410.005025.76ac9efd.en.html).

I have no idea if 'finalizers' is the right parameter, but I didn't see any
others that looked like it could be synonymous with 'stop_run'.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2296 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the replacement for the 'stop_run' callback?
  2010-10-17 14:06 What is the replacement for the 'stop_run' callback? Tad Ashlock
@ 2010-10-17 16:24 ` Hans Hagen
  2010-10-19 12:52   ` Tad Ashlock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2010-10-17 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On 17-10-2010 4:06, Tad Ashlock wrote:

> I'm trying to update a ConTeXt module of mine.  It does some data gathering
> during the ConTeXt run, and then processes it after the run is complete.
>   This used to work last year:
>
> local id, err = callback.register('stop_run', new_stop_run_function)
>
> But now err is set to "callback 'stop_run' is frozen (actions performed at
> the end of a run)".

indeed

> After trying various approaches for a couple of hours, I'm calling for help.
> :)

> Here's what I ended up with:
>
> \startluacode
> print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST1')
> local function after_run (head, groupcode)
>      print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST2')
>      return head, true
> end
> nodes.tasks.appendaction('finalizers','after','after_run')
> \stopluacode
> \starttext
> \input knuth
> \stoptext
>
> In the output, I see the TEST1 line, but not the TEST2 line.

because after_run is not seen,

function myprivatenamespace.after_run ...

nodes.tasks.appendaction('finalizers','after','myprivatenamespace.after_run')

> I don't know what "head" and "groupcode" are, but those seem to be the
> expected parameters for an action.  I don't know why it returns "head,
> true", but that was recommended in a posting (
> http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100410.005025.76ac9efd.en.html).

whatever, it's not the place to hook in your finalizer as there 
finalizers are just a specific place in node list processing

> I have no idea if 'finalizers' is the right parameter, but I didn't see any
> others that looked like it could be synonymous with 'stop_run'.

You can use (preferable no messages there):

   luatex.registerstopactions(yourfunction)

or for messages:

   statistics.register("banner",function() return "text" end)

in this case returning false (or nil) will not show the statistic which 
makes sense if there's nothing useful to report.

At some point there will be a formal description for this.

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: What is the replacement for the 'stop_run' callback?
  2010-10-17 16:24 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2010-10-19 12:52   ` Tad Ashlock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tad Ashlock @ 2010-10-19 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2847 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:24, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:

> On 17-10-2010 4:06, Tad Ashlock wrote:
>
>  I'm trying to update a ConTeXt module of mine.  It does some data
>> gathering
>> during the ConTeXt run, and then processes it after the run is complete.
>>  This used to work last year:
>>
>> local id, err = callback.register('stop_run', new_stop_run_function)
>>
>> But now err is set to "callback 'stop_run' is frozen (actions performed at
>> the end of a run)".
>>
>
> indeed
>
>
>  After trying various approaches for a couple of hours, I'm calling for
>> help.
>> :)
>>
>
>  Here's what I ended up with:
>>
>> \startluacode
>> print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST1')
>> local function after_run (head, groupcode)
>>     print('%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TEST2')
>>     return head, true
>> end
>> nodes.tasks.appendaction('finalizers','after','after_run')
>> \stopluacode
>> \starttext
>> \input knuth
>> \stoptext
>>
>> In the output, I see the TEST1 line, but not the TEST2 line.
>>
>
> because after_run is not seen,
>
> function myprivatenamespace.after_run ...
>
>
> nodes.tasks.appendaction('finalizers','after','myprivatenamespace.after_run')
>
>
>  I don't know what "head" and "groupcode" are, but those seem to be the
>> expected parameters for an action.  I don't know why it returns "head,
>> true", but that was recommended in a posting (
>> http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100410.005025.76ac9efd.en.html
>> ).
>>
>
> whatever, it's not the place to hook in your finalizer as there finalizers
> are just a specific place in node list processing
>
>
>  I have no idea if 'finalizers' is the right parameter, but I didn't see
>> any
>> others that looked like it could be synonymous with 'stop_run'.
>>
>
> You can use (preferable no messages there):
>
>  luatex.registerstopactions(yourfunction)
>
> or for messages:
>
>  statistics.register("banner",function() return "text" end)
>
> in this case returning false (or nil) will not show the statistic which
> makes sense if there's nothing useful to report.
>
> At some point there will be a formal description for this.
>
> Hans
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

Hans,

The registerstopactions() function was the solution I was looking for, but
I've verified that both of the solutions work as expected.  I tested them
with both a single ConTeXt source file and a set of files in a Project ->
Product -> Component structure.

I'll wiki this soon.

Thanks,
Tad

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4550 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-19 12:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-17 14:06 What is the replacement for the 'stop_run' callback? Tad Ashlock
2010-10-17 16:24 ` Hans Hagen
2010-10-19 12:52   ` Tad Ashlock

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).