From: "Stefan Müller" <warrence.stm@gmx.de>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: \qedhere equivalent in ConTeXt
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:11:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D39DA72.7000301@gmx.de> (raw)
Hi list,
I tried something similar to (Mk IV version 2011.11.18 19:34):
Am 06.08.10 15:46, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
> \setupdescriptions
> [proof]
> [width=broad,
> distance=0.5em,
> location=serried,
> headstyle=it,
> indentnext=yes,
> indenting=yes,
> closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
> closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
>
> Wolfgang
I hope I can get help on an issue I have with this. Please consider the
minimal example:
\starttext
\definedescription[proof][text=Proof., width=fit, location=serried,
indenting=yes, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
\startproof
\input knuth
\stopproof
\startproof
conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion
conclusion.
\stopproof
\stoptext
I don't know how to achieve this, but I would like to have the squares
at the end of both "proofs" one line higher than they are now and placed
right, as in (consider the extra space, which avoids the hyphenation):
\startproof
conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion conclusion
conclu sion.
\stopproof
Any help appreciated. Thanks in advance,
Stefan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 19:11 Stefan Müller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-05 9:59 Emanuele Sacco
2010-08-05 11:58 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-08-05 15:09 ` Emanuele Sacco
2010-08-05 18:02 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-08-05 20:17 ` Emanuele Sacco
2010-08-06 13:46 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2010-08-07 8:54 ` Emanuele Sacco
2010-08-07 9:01 ` Thomas Schmitz
2010-08-07 9:34 ` Emanuele Sacco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D39DA72.7000301@gmx.de \
--to=warrence.stm@gmx.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).