ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* \definesynonyms broken?
@ 2011-01-26 10:13 Verhaag, G.C.H.M.
  2011-01-26 11:07 ` Peter Münster
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Verhaag, G.C.H.M. @ 2011-01-26 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Hi,

I use \definesynonyms in several documents but it seems to be broken! 
For testing purposes I use the folowing command:

\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]

\kind{to}{test one!}
\kind{t}{sonething else}

\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]

\state{a}{anything}
\state{ab}{anything b}

\starttext

My test \infull{to}!

\stoptext

The \infull{to} in the My test.. line is empty, but if I remove the 
\definesynonyms[state]... and \state commands the line says: My test 
test one!! Isn't this very weird?

What has happened?

Regards,
Gerard Verhaag

P.S. I use ConTeXt  ver: 2011.01.18 19:34 MKIV  fmt: 2011.1.19  int: 
english/english!

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: \definesynonyms broken?
  2011-01-26 10:13 \definesynonyms broken? Verhaag, G.C.H.M.
@ 2011-01-26 11:07 ` Peter Münster
  2011-01-26 14:35   ` Verhaag, G.C.H.M.
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Münster @ 2011-01-26 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

"Verhaag, G.C.H.M." <verhaaggchm@ziggo.nl> writes:

> \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
> \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]

Don't use the same command. Better:

\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull]
\definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull]

-- 
           Peter
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: \definesynonyms broken?
  2011-01-26 11:07 ` Peter Münster
@ 2011-01-26 14:35   ` Verhaag, G.C.H.M.
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Verhaag, G.C.H.M. @ 2011-01-26 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Peter Münster wrote:

>"Verhaag, G.C.H.M." <verhaaggchm@ziggo.nl> writes:
>
>  
>
>>\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
>>\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]
>>    
>>
>
>Don't use the same command. Better:
>
>\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull]
>\definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull]
>
>  
>
Hi,

Thanks for the tip!

I didn't know that I was free to choose the command representing the 
last parameter of the \definesynonyms command! So that's why I used 
\infull in both definitions, but your suggestion is of course THE solution.

Regards,
Gerard Verhaag
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-26 14:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-26 10:13 \definesynonyms broken? Verhaag, G.C.H.M.
2011-01-26 11:07 ` Peter Münster
2011-01-26 14:35   ` Verhaag, G.C.H.M.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).