From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/66613 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: One-off theorem titles Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:33:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4D70C015.9040309@wxs.nl> References: <4D6F4BC0.4090106@googlemail.com> <48CEA267-A4E3-4DA4-B26A-3F64389B2C10@gmail.com> <8473E733-9BB1-48E7-821D-1260EBEC79E7@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299234880 5708 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2011 10:34:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:34:40 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Mar 04 11:34:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvSLD-0001Ea-Cn for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:34:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3857CAA94; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HUWAyFjHjzuP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100C8CAA91; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D97CAA91 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rd9dGziazMKT for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter1-til.mf.surf.net (filter1-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.217]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930C5CAA78 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter1-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p24AYQwh010347 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:34:27 +0100 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.100; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 5.1c2) with ESMTP id 7601-1713362 for multiple; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:34:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 In-Reply-To: X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=11; city=Den Haag; latitude=52.0833; longitude=4.3000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.0833,4.3000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 08EeWyqBW - bee72067f41f - 20110304 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.217 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:66613 Archived-At: On 4-3-2011 12:55, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > I also like \_. That is better than \ > that I have been using. Of course, this means that _ should not have its > usual meaning. I haven't checked on how \unprotect works in MkII. If it > makes _ a letter, then I'll switch to \_. the main disadvantage of _ (at least in the past) is that it can get = invisible on a low res screen > Another option might be to use \. with . having the > right catcode. That will give macro names a more OOP feel. indeed, but unfortunately it clashes with . being other in dimensions = (althoug i can imagine that we patch luatex to accept it) >>> I know that \do \dodo \dododo is not the best notation, but I don't >>> find _ __ ___ better. >> >> I don=92t like the __ and ___ either but do you know a better way for go= od >> names without using do, dodo, nodo, yes or nop? we can have module_do_bla or module_x_bla module_xx_bla etc > I find that \module__command and \module___command are hard to > distinguish. For helper macros, a better idea might be: > > \module_command > \module_command! > \module_command!! or \module_!_command \module_!!_command > These commands are easy to distinguish visually. But this will not work > for too well for three or four levels. I think that none of the schemes > look good for three or four levels. Perhaps we could mix both existing > schemes to get something reasonable: > > \module_command > \module_command! > \module_command!do > \module_command!redo > > or maybe > > \module_command > \module_command_one > \module_command_two > \module_command_three or \module_command_a \module_command_b \module_command_aa (used by _a) etc actually we can use ^ if we want: \module_^_command \module_^^_command Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________