From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Difference between MKII, XeTeX and MKIV
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:52:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7E63E4.4060706@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikFDAOvH+N3wAoG2NfAVWTg58kGYHGSHxWE=uRN@mail.gmail.com>
On 14-3-2011 7:26, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> 2011/3/14 Marco<netuse@lavabit.com>
>
>> On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof<cldwesterhof@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
>>> you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
>>
>> MKII can be used either with pdftex or xetex (as you wish, compare
>> advantages/disadvantages). MKIV can only be used with luatex.
>>
>> You have to differ between ConTeXt »versions« (mkii, mkiv) and TeX backends
>> (pdftex, xetex, luatex).
>>
>
> And where do I find the advantages/disadvantages? Or can I just always use
> MKIV?
As already mentioned speed depends on the kind of document. In general
context runs slower with xetex and luatex if only because these are
unicode engines while pdftex is 8 bit.
Occasionally i do speed tests and it also depends on the operating
system, file caching etc. For luatex the size of the cpu cache also
matters. Although pdftex/mkiv is always faster unless on eused metapoist
in which case mkiv is a clear winner (the metafun manual runs in tens of
seconds in mkiv but takes many minutes in mkii. Comparing xetex/mkii
and luatex/mkiv is difficult as xetex also pipes its output to a dvi
backend. On some tests mkiv is faster, on some others mkii but I must
admit that i only tested simple document.
On a raw simple document, pdftex can be twice as fast as xetex or
luatex. The more lua driven features are used, the slower mkiv becomes
but in general it does a better job then.
Anyhow .. only luatex/mkiv will evolve so best stick to that.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 17:22 Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 18:13 ` Marco
2011-03-14 18:26 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 18:44 ` Marco
2011-03-14 19:31 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-14 21:49 ` Marco
2011-03-18 2:54 ` mathew
2011-03-18 10:02 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-14 18:52 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D7E63E4.4060706@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).