Re: 620 pages limit?

From: Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com>
To: Steffen Wolfrum <context@st.estfiles.de>
Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: 620 pages limit?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:35:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7F875F.4080608@elvenkind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B24DFF5B-71EB-4DDE-8C49-0267665EA1A3@st.estfiles.de>

On 03/15/2011 03:44 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> Am 15.03.2011 um 11:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>
>>
>> Am 15.03.2011 um 10:07 schrieb Vnpenguin:
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>> Taco
>>>>>
>>>>> Not here:
>>>>> \starttext
>>>>> \dorecurse{5000} {\input knuth \page }
>>>>> \stoptext
>>>>> pages>  flushing realpage 3987, userpage 3987
>>>>> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (stack overflow (out of
>>>>> stack space))
>>>>>
>>>>> mtx-context     | fatal error: return code: 1
>>>>> with latest minimals.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have exactely same error as you on Linux x86_64 CentOS , luatex
>>>> beta-0.65.0-2010121316
>>>>
>>>> However on my Windows XP (always with Minimals distro) I can compile
>>>> without error. On Windows I have :
>>>> E:\User\xxx\tex>luatex --version
>>>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.66.0-2011021923 (Web2C 2010) (rev 4086)
>>>>
>>>> Maybe luatex of Linux 64bit is out-of-date ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just update luatex to beta-0.66.0-2011031509 (rev 4090) and now I got
>>> 5000-pages PDF :)
>>
>>
>> I also updated now [got beta-0.66.0-2011031511 (rev 4090)]
>> but still my project gives a PANIC!
>>
>> I'll try now to boil down a minimal example out of my chapters ...
>
>
> Four hours later:
> Still I do not have a "minimal" example. But I think I have an idea what might be the problem:
> The number of footnotes seems to have an impact.
> I boiled it down to a version of my project where just a little additional note causes PANIC.
> Adding another page of text or a sectioning heading or anything else is fine.
>
> Does this help further finding the bug?

Not really, sorry. Unless the problem gets worse if you add extra 
footnotes earlier?

> Does it make sense to have compare both tuc files (the last working and the first buggy)?

Probably not.

Best wishes,
Taco
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________