From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does MKIV take more time as MKII
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D80E7D1.2040505@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=SDb9Y=drDYGdU6bhx4eKOy2J3bPWT2HZA+4qk@mail.gmail.com>
On 14-3-2011 8:52, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> PS: You would get the same kind of behaviour in MKII (however if MKII
> only runs twice and if there is a speed factor of 1.5, you could
> declare MKII being "three times faster" which does make some
> difference when compilation time is long).
depends on the changes ... in an automated flow, if you knwo what
happens you can limit it with a flag
> PPS (not to be taken (too) seriously): But I wouldn't be surprized if,
> say, two years from now you would try to repeat the experiment just to
> find out that MKIV became faster. (Unlikely to happen, but imaging
sure, i'm current redoing the font code a bit and gain some time (and
memory in mkiv) .. but don't expect miracles
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 10:23 Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 11:44 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2011-03-14 11:48 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 13:02 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 13:34 ` Alan BRASLAU
2011-03-14 13:47 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 19:52 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-14 20:22 ` John Haltiwanger
2011-03-15 7:56 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2011-03-16 16:39 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2011-03-16 16:52 ` luigi scarso
2011-03-16 16:59 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-14 17:54 ` Philipp Gesang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D80E7D1.2040505@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).