From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: DocBook in ConTeXt - any new ideas?
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:03:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE77C02.50002@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik3UM9CnS0AtupiSDoSHYMOYum6bA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
> Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
> couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
> finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
> and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a question of at
> least a couple of personmonths if not worse. Sadly, I'm not in a
> position to that now.
Months? I never had a reason for doing a docbook mapping but a couple of
hours should get you a start. Th eonly reason why I'd look into docbook
is if I'd need in in a project. (I'd happily spent a few well paid
months on it then.)
You probably don't need all of docbook, so you could start with some
simple tests. The mkii docbook stuff you mentioned definitely is doing a
small subset.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-02 9:39 Piotr Kopszak
2011-06-02 10:20 ` Thomas Schmitz
2011-06-02 10:53 ` Piotr Kopszak
2011-06-02 12:03 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2011-06-02 17:17 ` Bruce
2011-06-02 20:20 ` Hans Hagen
2011-06-03 15:43 ` R. Ermers
2011-06-03 16:28 ` Hans Hagen
2011-06-04 8:21 ` R. Ermers
2011-06-04 9:06 ` Hans Hagen
2011-06-04 9:57 ` R. Ermers
2011-06-04 12:24 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-06-04 13:25 ` R. Ermers
2011-06-05 10:46 ` Hans Hagen
2011-06-02 11:58 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE77C02.50002@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).